Understanding Wave Phase: Definition and Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter foxjwill
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Phase Wave
AI Thread Summary
The phase of a wave at time t is defined as ωt + φ, while some sources, like Wikipedia, suggest it can also be expressed as ωt + φ modulo 2π. Both definitions yield the same result when applied to trigonometric functions, but they can lead to different interpretations. The discussion highlights the confusion caused by varying definitions, especially in academic settings, where specific terminology can impact grading. Caution is advised when relying solely on Wikipedia for definitions, as it may contain inaccuracies. Understanding the nuances of wave phase is essential for clarity in physics.
foxjwill
Messages
350
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is the definition of the phase (not phase shift) at some time t of a wave? Specifically, for a wave oscillating according to the equation

x=A\sin(\omega t + \phi),

what is the the phase at some time t?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Our book says the phase is \omega t + \phi, while http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phase_%28waves%29" says that it can also be \omega t + \phi modulo 2\pi. Which is right?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I suggest you reread the wikipedia definition (in this case), they mightn't be as different as you think.

On a side note, I would be wary of taking wikipedia for gospel. It is very useful, but mistakes can be common.
 
Last edited:
astrorob said:
I suggest you reread the wikipedia definition (in this case), they mightn't be as different as you think.

I know that they're not that different, but the reason I'm asking is that I lost points on a quiz for using the modulo 2\pi value because my teacher chose to use the definition given by our book (which I had forgotten since this was a review quiz on material we covered last semester).

astrorob said:
On a side note, I would be wary of taking wikipedia for gospel. It is very useful, but mistakes can be common.

Yes, but that's why I'm asking. I couldn't find very much about either definition of phase anywhere else, although I didn't take very much time to look.
 
Well, as Wikipedia mentions, I think it's one of those things that isn't as clear cut as perhaps it should be.

Personally I'm with you since the \omega t + \phi, and its corresponding modulo 2\pi value will both yield the same value under trigonometric function.

However, I can see the flip side of the coin. If the phase is defined as the number between the brackets, then strictly speaking that number is not the same as its modulo 2\pi value.

Sorry I can't be of more conclusive help!
Rob.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top