Understanding X-ray Tube Components: Anode Confusion Explained

AI Thread Summary
In an X-ray tube, the tungsten insert serves as the target where electrons collide, while the copper component helps dissipate heat. Both the tungsten insert and the copper are considered parts of the anode, but only the tungsten is directly hit by the electron beam. The term "tungsten insert" refers to its removable nature, allowing for replacement or modification. Most energy from the electron collisions is converted into heat rather than X-rays due to the inefficiency of the process, with over 98% resulting in heat generation. Understanding these components is crucial for improving X-ray efficiency in applications like lithography.
nousername
Messages
31
Reaction score
1
Hey,

In an X-ray tube, you know how there is the target where the electrons collide and stuff... and you know how there is the tungsten part and the the copper bit (the tungsten being the one which electrons collide on)... well my book discusses them separately and i am just a bit confused:

1) Are they both anodes? I.e. both are the positive terminal?
2) Which one is referred to as the target? - Is it both or just the tungsten insert?
3) Why is it called the tungsten INSERT? Do we insert it in there or something?
4) Why are they separated? Why can't we just have it all tungsten or all copper?

Thanks

EDIT:

5) Also, why does a lot of heat get generated at the anode? My guess would be because the electrons are hitting the anode... but why does it generate heat when it hits? Why can't all the energy be converted into X-rays? - Apparently over 98% of the energy of the electrons is converted to heat! WHY?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes amyrheniumcn
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
We can't really control things at the subatomic level. We just slam the electrons into the target and take what we get. What we get is that most of the energy gets converted into heat and only a little bit gets emitted as X-Rays. People are working on higher efficiency sources, especially for X-ray lithography. Here is one example, but even this is only about 4% efficient:
http://epsppd.epfl.ch/London/pdf/P4_214.pdf
 
  • Like
Likes amyrheniumcn
@A.T.

hahaha, yea sorry i have test tomorrow so i can't really do much research. Thanks btw :)

@phyzguy

Thanks :)

So how about questions 1-3?
 
1) what would happen to the electron path, if they collected up a large (-) charge?
2) only the insert is _supposed_ to be hit by the beam
3) in some devices, the insert can be removed, to be replaced with a new one perhaps,
or replaced with an insert made of different material, or with a different shape face.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Back
Top