Understanding Zeeman Splitting: Predicting Components in Weak Applied Fields

  • Thread starter Thread starter hhhmortal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Splitting Zeeman
hhhmortal
Messages
175
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



(Q1) Which transition will produce a normal zeeman triplet in a weak applied field?


(Q2) The sodium resonance line is a doublet. What is the total number of components that appear when the line is split by a weak applied field?


The Attempt at a Solution



(Q1) 1D2 --> 1P1 or 2P(3/2) ---> 2S(1/2) ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
q1. Seems correct - remember you can't shift between states with the same l-number.
 
The visual effect above is awful, sorry.

1. Sufficient and neccesary conditions for normal Zeeman triplet is:

The total number of electrons is even, and the electrons form the state with S=0, 2S+1=1.

2. As to the famous sodium doublet, the 589.6nm line will split into four lines, with frequency difference 2/3 Lorentz unit (LU), 3/4 LU, 2/3 LU, respectively; the 589.0nm line splits into six ones, with identical frequency difference of 2/3 LU. No line exists at the initial location any more.

Comments:

1. Sodium Doublet: 589.6nm: 2P_(3/2) ----->2S_(1/2), 589.0nm: 2P_(1/2) ----->2S_(1/2).

2. Transition Rule: \Delta m = +1, 0, -1.

589.0nm: 2P_(1/2) ----->2S_(1/2), m, mg

---|----------------------------------------------------- 3/2, 2
---|---------|----|-------------------------------------- 1/2, 2/3
---|---------|----|---------|----|---------------------- -1/2, -2/3
---|---------|----|---------|----|----------|----------- -3/2, -2
1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
---|---------|----|---------|----|----------|----------- 1/2, 1
------------------|--------------|----------|----------- -1/2, -1



589.6nm: 2P_(1/2) ----->2S_(1/2), m, mg

---|---------------------------------------------------- 1/2, 2/3
---|---|-----------------|----|------------------------- -1/2, -2/3
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
---|---|-----------------|----|-------------------------- 1/2, 1
-------|----------------------|-------------------------- -1/2, -1


where $g$ above is Lande g fractor, and for effectively mono-electron atoms, such as 1H, 3Li, 11Na, 19K, 29Cu, 47Ag, 79Au,

3 1 S * (S+1) -- L * (L+1)
g = --- + --- (---------------------------------)
2 2 J * (J+1)
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top