Zeeman Splitting, Paschen-Back Effect

  • Thread starter Thread starter hhhmortal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Splitting Zeeman
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the strength of an applied magnetic field affecting sodium resonance lines, specifically at wavelengths 588.5 nm, 589 nm, and 590.1 nm. The user attempts to apply the formula E = (m_l + 2m_s) B μ_B for strong magnetic fields but encounters an error leading to an implausibly large magnetic field value. The key issue lies in the interpretation of the energy change (E) and the corresponding wavelength shift (∆λ), which is determined to be 0.8 nm.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Zeeman effect and Paschen-Back effect
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics concepts, particularly angular momentum
  • Knowledge of the relationship between energy, wavelength, and magnetic fields
  • Proficiency in using the formula E = (m_l + 2m_s) B μ_B
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Zeeman effect and its implications in atomic physics
  • Study the Paschen-Back effect and its differences from the Zeeman effect
  • Learn about the calculation of magnetic field strength from spectral line splitting
  • Explore advanced quantum mechanics topics related to angular momentum and energy levels
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in atomic physics, particularly those studying magnetic effects on atomic spectra, as well as educators teaching quantum mechanics concepts.

hhhmortal
Messages
175
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In a very strong applied field the sodium resonance lines is foudn to have components at 588.5 nm, 589 nm and 590.1 nm. What is the strength of the applied field?


The Attempt at a Solution



So I have:

3P_(1/2) --> 3S_(1/2)

AND

3P_(3/2) ---> 3S_(1/2)


Then I know, for strong magnetic fields:

E = (m_l + 2m_s ) B μ_B

I found the max change in (m_l + 2m_s ) to be about 2 and the change in E to be hc/∆λ and I know ∆λ is 0.8 nm :

If I put all this into the equation I get B to be very large, which is clearly wrong..what I am I doing wrong?


Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is anyone able to help me with this question?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K