Uniform ball rolling without slipping problem

pentazoid
Messages
142
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A uniform ball of mass M and raduis a can roll without slipping on the rough outer surface of a fixed sphere of raduis b and centre O. Initially the ball is at rest at the highest point of the phere when it is slightly disturbed . Find the speed of the center the G of the ball in terms of the variable theta , the angle between the line OG and the upward vertical. [Assume planar motion]. Show that the ball will leave the sphere when cos (theta)=10/17


Homework Equations



linear momentum principle

M*dV/dt=dP/dt=F

The Attempt at a Solution



answer: v^2=(10/7)*g(a+b)(1-cos(theta)

since they give you v^2 and v^2 is associated with the kinetic energy of a particle, should I apply the Energy principle rather than the linear momentum principle.

I probably should break the x and y components of the ball with radius b and the hemisphere with to sin(theta) and cos(theta) components. the y- componet will contained the weight of the balls while the x-component will not.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi pentazoid! :smile:
pentazoid said:
should I apply the Energy principle rather than the linear momentum principle.

Yes! You must use energy to find the speed …

how could you apply linear momentum when there's no linear motion and there's gravity?

But you will need Newton's second law to find when the normal force is zero.
I probably should break the x and y components of the ball with radius b and the hemisphere with to sin(theta) and cos(theta) components. the y- componet will contained the weight of the balls while the x-component will not.

hmm … probably easier to use radial and tangential components …

the ball will lose contact when the normal (ie radial) force is zero. :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi pentazoid! :smile:


Yes! You must use energy to find the speed …

how could you apply linear momentum when there's no linear motion and there's gravity?

But you will need Newton's second law to find when the normal force is zero.


V=Mgh = Mg(b+a)cos(theta) (h=0 at theta=90 degrees)

E=T+V

at top , ball is at rest
E(initial)=1/2*M*(0)^2+1/2*I*(0)+Mg(a+b)=Mg(a+b)

E(final)= 1/2*Mv^2+1/2*(2/5*Ma^2)(v/a)^2+ Mg(b+a)cos(theta)

E(i)=E(f) ==> Mg(b+a)=1/2*M*(7/5)v^2+Mg(b+a)cos(theta)

7/10*v^2==g(b+a)(1-cos(theta))

v^2=10/7* g(b+a)(1-cos(theta))

not sure how to find the angle between the line OG and the up ward vertical. How would I show that cos(theta)=10/17 when ball leaves sphere?

to get the normal force would I differentiate v

m*dv/dt=dP/dt=F=0

and I can now find theta?
 
Hi pentazoid! :smile:

(have a theta: θ and a squared: ² :wink:)
pentazoid said:
V=Mgh = Mg(b+a)cos(theta) (h=0 at theta=90 degrees)

E=T+V

at top , ball is at rest
E(initial)=1/2*M*(0)^2+1/2*I*(0)+Mg(a+b)=Mg(a+b)

E(final)= 1/2*Mv^2+1/2*(2/5*Ma^2)(v/a)^2+ Mg(b+a)cos(theta)

E(i)=E(f) ==> Mg(b+a)=1/2*M*(7/5)v^2+Mg(b+a)cos(theta)

7/10*v^2==g(b+a)(1-cos(theta))

v^2=10/7* g(b+a)(1-cos(theta))

Very good! :biggrin:

(except most people use U for KE, since V looks too much like v :wink:)
not sure how to find the angle between the line OG and the up ward vertical. How would I show that cos(theta)=10/17 when ball leaves sphere?

to get the normal force would I differentiate v

Nooo … as I said, use Newton's second law …

what are the forces on the ball? …

they have to equal the centripetal acceleration …

so work out when the normal force becomes zero. :smile:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top