Unit in a ring (abstract algebra)

cummings12332
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Is (x^2-1) a unit in F[x]? where F is a field.


2. The attempt at a solution
I might say yes, cause we can find the taylor expansion of 1/(x^2-1), is my idea right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cummings12332 said:

Homework Statement


Is (x^2-1) a unit in F[x]? where F is a field.


2. The attempt at a solution
I might say yes, cause we can find the taylor expansion of 1/(x^2-1), is my idea right?

The taylor expansion is not a polynomial. It has an infinite number of terms.
 
it has been a long time since I studied Ring Theory, but here is what I remember that might be relevant:

A unit is an element that has an inverse. So in order for ##x^2-1## to be a unit, there would have to exist an inverse of ##x^2-1## in your field. Your suggestion of ##\frac{1}{x^2-1}## is a reasonable candidate, but I do not believe it is an element of your field. This is because I always took ##F[x]## to represent the ring of finite degree polynomials over the field, F, and the Taylor expansion of ##\frac{1}{x^2-1}## is infinite.

In my opinion, the answer needs to be "no." I think proving this hinges on the fact that we're in a field (and hence an integral domain) so there is no terms that can multiply by ##x^2## to make the leading coefficient zero.

Good Luck!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top