Schools University of Nebraska-Lincoln REU - advice?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a physics major's acceptance into the University of Nebraska-Lincoln's REU program, focusing on nanostructured thin films for gene delivery, despite a lack of interest in DNA. Participants emphasize that the REU experience will involve hands-on laboratory research rather than traditional classroom learning, and suggest reaching out to the advisor for preparatory materials. Engaging with the project, even if it’s outside the participant's main interests, is encouraged as it may lead to valuable contributions and learning opportunities. Staying connected with the advisor and lab group post-REU is also highlighted as beneficial for future academic or career prospects. The participant expresses excitement about the opportunity and plans to prepare accordingly.
ModestyKing
Messages
142
Reaction score
17
Hi there PF,
I've been accepted to the University of Nebraska-Lincoln's REU program, with my adviser being Dr. Angela Pannier. The project is: Nanostructured Thin Films as Biomaterial Interfaces for Enhanced Substrate-mediated Gene Delivery
I'm a physics major, and DNA is not my thing, really (wondering why I was put on that project, honestly! I wanted to work on their high efficiency organic solar cells project), but I've definitely wanted to work with thin films. I wanted to ask for advice, as this is my first REU.
1) In an REU (whether it be this topic or not), how much do I actually learn about the topic/theory behind the project? Is it like taking a class just on it, or much more than that?
2) This is going to involve a lot of lab work, especially in stuff I'm not used to. Should I try to get a grad student at my home institution to show me the ropes? I've been offered the chance, but I don't want to learn something that may be, in fact, the opposite of what the lab at UNL does.
3) Even though this isn't in my top field of interest, should I treat it like it is? Read up on the theory, pretend it's exactly what I want to do later on while I'm doing it? I think I could, and I'd excel, but the other option is to try and work on parts of the project that I can integrate or even relate to what my main interests are.
4) How much should I stay in contact after the REU?
5) If anyone knows Dr. Pannier, is there anything in particular I should pay attention to or do with her?

And any advice for a first-timer REU participant would be great! Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ModestyKing said:
Hi there PF,
I've been accepted to the University of Nebraska-Lincoln's REU program, with my adviser being Dr. Angela Pannier. The project is: Nanostructured Thin Films as Biomaterial Interfaces for Enhanced Substrate-mediated Gene Delivery
I'm a physics major, and DNA is not my thing, really (wondering why I was put on that project, honestly! I wanted to work on their high efficiency organic solar cells project), but I've definitely wanted to work with thin films. I wanted to ask for advice, as this is my first REU.
1) In an REU (whether it be this topic or not), how much do I actually learn about the topic/theory behind the project? Is it like taking a class just on it, or much more than that?
2) This is going to involve a lot of lab work, especially in stuff I'm not used to. Should I try to get a grad student at my home institution to show me the ropes? I've been offered the chance, but I don't want to learn something that may be, in fact, the opposite of what the lab at UNL does.
3) Even though this isn't in my top field of interest, should I treat it like it is? Read up on the theory, pretend it's exactly what I want to do later on while I'm doing it? I think I could, and I'd excel, but the other option is to try and work on parts of the project that I can integrate or even relate to what my main interests are.
4) How much should I stay in contact after the REU?
5) If anyone knows Dr. Pannier, is there anything in particular I should pay attention to or do with her?

And any advice for a first-timer REU participant would be great! Thanks.

1. You will be doing laboratory research. This will not be like classes.
2. More than likely, yes. Probably the best thing to do is to contact the advisor and ask for some papers, etc. to read to help you hit the ground running. More than likely, she will plan on pairing you up with a graduate student or post-doc in her lab, and this will provide her with the opportunity to introduce you to whomever that is. Read the material (most likely papers from her group). if you have questions to ask, you should go ahead and ask. The advisor should be happy that you are planning for the summer.
3. Do as best as you can do. I think that the topic is broad enough that the group working on it will be quite diverse, background-wise. You will leanr a lot. If you are engaged, you might help them solve a problem that nobody in the lab has the background to solve!
4. You would definitely want to stay connected with the group and advisor. If you work your butt off, and are memorable in good ways (you don't want to be memorable in a bad way!) you will be able to get a strong letter from the advisor for graduate school, employment, afterwards.
5. I know nothing about this professor.
 
Hi Quantum Defect,
Thank you for the reply!
I've contacted the professor as advised, and she will be sending out materials to me and the other participants in a few weeks. I'm excited to have this opportunity!
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top