Upwards buoyancy pressure only acts on the surface of a structure that

AI Thread Summary
Upwards buoyancy pressure acts only on the surface of a structure that is submerged, specifically the surface facing downward. In a cube-like structure, only the bottom surface needs to be considered when calculating downward pressure, which supports the mass of the structure. If the pressure at the bottom of the cube is 2700 kPa, it will reach equilibrium at a depth of 270 meters, where the water pressure matches this value. The forces acting on the sides of the cube cancel each other out and do not contribute to the net upward force. For partially submerged objects, buoyancy is determined by the difference in pressure across the submerged surfaces, and air pressure must also be considered if the top surface is submerged.
gloo
Messages
261
Reaction score
2
so with buoyancy and liquid pressure i am pretty sure i know the answer but i just want to confirm (please don't laugh if it's obvious)

- upwards buoyancy pressure only acts on the surface of a structure that is faced down
- the bottom of the structure that supports all the mass of the structure (assume a cube like structure for simplicity) is the only area that has to be taken into account when calculating pressure on the downside.
- if the pressure on the bottom of the cube surface is 2700kpa, it will find equilibrium and stop at 2700 kpa of the ocean (270 meters)
 
Physics news on Phys.org


gloo said:
- upwards buoyancy pressure only acts on the surface of a structure that is faced down
No, it is the total resultant force.
- the bottom of the structure that supports all the mass of the structure (assume a cube like structure for simplicity) is the only area that has to be taken into account when calculating pressure on the downside.
...and supports the water above the object.
- if the pressure on the bottom of the cube surface is 2700kpa, it will find equilibrium and stop at 2700 kpa of the ocean (270 meters)
No, if the pressure is 2700 kpa, then it is at a depth where the pressure is 2700 kpa! It can't be anywhere else!
 


thanks Russ - i just want to clarify points 1 and 3

1. I guess i was making an assumptiom buoyancy meant upward for this point. I was trying to say that buoyant force pusing upward on the object only acts on the surface of the cube facing downward (partial submersion). The forces on the side will cancel out and have no net effect upward

3. in a partial submersion scenario, if the formula of pressure=force/area - and whatever the force of gravity on the cube and it's contents and divide by the area of the bottom of the cube, and it's answer is 2700kpa, then the bottom of the cube will sink until it reaches 270 meters (where the pressure is 2700kpa). There the pressure downward on the cube's bottom surface is equal to the upward pressure of the water at that depth, and that is where the cube will stop sinking (equilibrium?)
 


Yes, in the case of a partially submerged cube with its sides kept perfectly vertical, only the water pressure on the bottom surface contributes to the upward buoyant force. (But don't forget air pressure pushing down on the top surface.)
 


For #3, that's only true if the top surface is not submerged. If the top surface is under water, then the bouyant force is equal to the difference in pressure (times area). For a submerged object, bouyancy is not a function of depth.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top