Use of phasor representation in physics

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
Abel I Daniel
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Why do we use phasor representation in physics..For example,why we need maxwells equation in phasor form as well??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Phasors are good for waves of constant frequency ... hence electrical engineers use them for AC circuits, and they use them a lot.

So you will probably only use phasors while studying AC circuits; they are useful only for linear systems.
 
ok ,thank you for the reply...what made me ask this question is-i saw maxwells equations(electromagnetic) written in phasor form from dpoint form by just substituting d/dt with jw..So what my questin is ,what is the implication of removing that time factor from that equation??
 
They were working in frequency space ... same place you go with the Laplace transform, or its cousin the Fourier transform.

In this case they assumed that the electromagnetic field was a harmonic wave - and plugged this into Maxwell's equations - leaving you with the "Phasor form of Maxwell's equations".

Here is a lecture which includes the derivation: http://ivp.ee.cuhk.edu.hk/~ele3310/data/ELE3310_Tutorial_10.pdf
 
Another reason is that properties of media are "easy". For example, for electric field:
[tex] \mathbf{D} = \epsilon_0 \mathbf{E} + \mathbf{P}[/tex]
but it is only for a single frequency that
[tex] \mathbf{P}(\omega) = \epsilon_0 \chi_e (\omega) \mathbf{E}(\omega).[/tex]
In the time domain we in general have a convolution,
[tex] \mathbf{P}(t) = \epsilon_0 \int^t d\tau \, \, \, \chi_e (\tau) \mathbf{E}(t-\tau).[/tex]

jason
 
Abel I Daniel said:
ok ,thank you for the reply...what made me ask this question is-i saw maxwells equations(electromagnetic) written in phasor form from dpoint form by just substituting d/dt with jw..So what my questin is ,what is the implication of removing that time factor from that equation??

You can assume a time dependence of exp(jwt) without losing generality due to the principle of superposition. For incident fields with multiple frequency components, you can solve Maxwell's equations for each frequency component, then sum the solutions at the end as required.

Claude.