Use the periodic table to write the electron configuration of Gd

AI Thread Summary
The electron configuration of Gd (atomic number 64) is debated, with one common representation being 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 3d10 4s2 4p6 4d10 4f7 5s2 5p6 5d1 6s2. The confusion arises from the placement of electrons in the 4f and 5d orbitals, as Gd has 4f7 instead of 4f8, which is occupied by terbium (Tb). Different educational institutions may have varying preferences for writing electron configurations, with some favoring the order of orbital filling while others prefer a sequential numbering system. It is important to follow the specific guidelines provided by instructors. Understanding these nuances is essential for accurately representing electron configurations in academic settings.
skander
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Use the periodic table to write the electron configuration of Gd.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Gd has 64 electrons (atomic number 64) so I would assume that the configuration would be:
1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 3d10 4s2 4p6 4d10 4f8 5s2 5p6 6s2

However when I checked my answer on a site that gave Gd's electron configuration it gave the configuration like this:
1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 3d10 4s2 4p6 4d10 4f7 5s2 5p6 5d1 6s2

Does anyone know why they would write it like that and are they correct or am I? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you look at the periodic table, the 4f8 spot is occupied by Tb. This should immediately raise a flag when reviewing your answer.

Following straight across the periodic table, the orbitals are filled up in the following order:

[Xe] 6s2 5d1 4f7

I hope this helps.
 
Okay, since Tb is 4f8 Gd has to be 4f7 giving rise to 5d1. Now when you wrote it as 6s2 5d1 4f7 was that specifically in that order? Because I thought we were supposed to write down electron configuration by 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 regardless of which orbital was actually filled last. Thanks.
 
Your teacher should specify the way he/she wants it done. My high school teacher wanted it done in the 1, 2, 3, 4, ... way, while my college professor requested that we try to represent the order in which the orbitals are actually filled.
 
Okay so I'm supposed to it the 1, 2, 3, ... for my course. Thank you very much for all your help.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top