Using area of pv graph to find work

  • Thread starter Thread starter Iwanttolearn7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Graph Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating work using the area under a p-v graph, specifically involving a small and large rectangle. The user initially struggles with determining which areas to calculate, leading to incorrect work values. Clarification is provided that the work can be found by integrating the pressure over the change in volume, requiring the average of the pressure and volume values. The user realizes that averaging the coordinates is crucial for accurate calculations, which resolves their confusion. Ultimately, understanding the integration of the areas under the curve is key to solving the problem correctly.
Iwanttolearn7
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An ideal graph is shown in a p-v diagram which looks like one small rectangle inside one large rectangle, with point one on the top right hand corner of the large rectangle leading negatively down to the right hand corner of the small rectangle.

The points of the small rectangle are:
p=2.0^5 Pa
v=0.5 m^3

The points of the large rectangle are:
p=5.0^5
v=1.0 m^3


Homework Equations



My professor said to use the area of the triangle and of the rectangle to calculate the Work.

So which triangle and rectangles do I find the areas of?

Thanks!


The Attempt at a Solution



I have tried different combinations of triangles and rectangle areas for the graph, and cannot come up with the correct answer, which is -1.8^5 J.

Examples:

area small rectangle: 2x10^5*0.5=1x10^5
area large triangle: (5x10^5*1)/2=2.5x10^5
total = 3.5^5 (wrong)

another combination:

area small triangle: (2x10^5*0.5)/2=5x10^4
area large rectangle: 5x10^5*1=5x10^5
total = 5.5x10^5

Thank you for your assistance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't make heads or tails of your description without the diagram. Also, how do two "points" define a rectangle? Were these meant to be their lengths and widths?
 
I can't really see your diagram, but as described isn't the line joining the two corners the P-V profile in moving from one volume to the other?

In which case, by taking the integral under the path of the P-V from the Volume of the small rectangle to the large you have a) a small rectangle from .5 to 1 of height 2. That area is 1/2 * 2 = 1

On top of that you have the additional area of the triangle that sits on top of height (5 - 2)*(1 - .5)*1/2 = .75

Add the 2 together ...
 
I really wish I had a picture of the graph. It is like no other on google relating to physics. Trust me, I tried. There are only two points on the graph. My description, including the coordinates, will draw out the correct graph, but I realize you may not have the time to draw it out.

I am confused as to how the last poster is getting the area of triangles by subtracting. I have learned that the equation is base*height/2. I wish I could understand where the subtracting is coming from.

I appreciate your attempts, I just can't figure this one out. If you have time, the description of the graph will let you draw out the exact two rectangles on the graph as well as the coordinate points. I posted on another forum too and someone came up with an answer that was correct, but used the wrong coordinates, so I have no idea what is going on.
 
Iwanttolearn7 said:
I am confused as to how the last poster is getting the area of triangles by subtracting. I have learned that the equation is base*height/2. I wish I could understand where the subtracting is coming from.

Noting that the you are wanting to find the work to go from one P-V coordinate to the other along a straight line, I summed two areas (taking the integral) under the P-V function, namely a triangle stacked on top of a rectangle.

Figure that F = P*A and W = F*Δx then W = P*ΔV

But your problem has P(v) as a function of volume. So figuring Work from F*Δx you need to take the integral over the change in volume. Which is what my calculation was intended to do.
 
Thank you very much! I also finally got to class and asked my Professor about it, and he said that I was supposed to use the AVERAGE of p and v to find the volume, which was my main problem. I was trying to use both p and both v points to find the volume when I should have been averaging them. But you are right, because after averaging the coordinates I needed to multiply them together. Wow, that was a difficult one. Thank you for your help!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top