Other Using Databases like Scopus to Find Trends in Physics

AI Thread Summary
To determine the current "hot" areas of physics using databases like Scopus, it is essential to clarify what "hot" and "still in development" mean. "Hot" refers to trending fields with significant research activity, while "still in development" indicates areas that are emerging or evolving. The identification of important fields can depend on various factors, including the number of researchers, the volume of published articles, and funding opportunities from prestigious institutions. For insights into what physicists find exciting, resources like the American Physical Society's highlighted research can be useful. The discussion emphasizes that the perceived heat of a field can vary based on the granularity of the subfields, illustrating that broader categories may appear more active than their specific subfields.
rsnelsonjose
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone. My question is how can I use databases like scopus to know which areas of physics are the "hot" today or which are still in development.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Define "hot" and "still in development". Or, asked differently, which area is not studied any more?
 
No no I've been looking for the most important fields of physics in the last decade, but I want to be sure using databases. Thats why I said "hot"...meaning "trend in the present"
 
Now define "most important" :smile:

The point being that the answer you get will depend a lot on the exact question you ask. Is it the number of people working in the field? The number of articles in Phys. Rev. Lett.? How much money [big name university] is willing to put to recruit a leader in the field?

If you want to get an idea of what physicists themselves think is exciting, I suggest you look at the research highlighted at
https://physics.aps.org
 
If we go purely by number of people working on it then every field is hotter than each of its subfields.
"Nuclear and particle physics" might be hotter than laser physics, but laser physics could be hotter than both nuclear physics and particle physics. Until you split laser physics into solid-state lasers and other lasers, then you get the reverse order again. Made-up example, but it should demonstrate the problem.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top