Using Energy and Impulse to Solve a Mass on a Spring Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter quark001
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Spring
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a mass hanging from a spring that is struck by an impulse, leading to questions about how high it rises above the equilibrium position. The forces acting on the mass include gravity, the restoring force, and the applied impulse. It is noted that the restoring force cancels out the weight of the mass, leaving only the applied force to consider. The conversation emphasizes using energy principles rather than solely relying on Newton's Laws to determine the final distance from equilibrium. Ultimately, understanding how to apply impulse to calculate initial energy is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
quark001
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
A mass m hangs from a spring. The natural angular frequency of the system is given in radians per second. The mass, while hanging at rest in equilibrium is struck from below and an impulse of x Newtons is imparted on the mass. How high above the equilibrium position does the mass rise?

So at the point in time where the mass is struck, the forces acting on it are gravity, the restoring force and the applied force. The restoring force (ks) is acting upwards and cancels with the weight (-mg), right? So we are left with the applied force. But how do use the impulse and angular frequency to progress from here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about the energy.
 
You're thinking in the correct direction in terms of Newton's Laws, but there is a much easier way to approach this using energy (as voko said).
Energy will give you the final distance from equilibrium, but you just need to figure out how to use impulse to solve for your initial energy.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top