Using energy concepts and possibly work bunjee jump problem

AI Thread Summary
To ensure a safe bungee jump, key factors include the height of the bridge, the jumper's weight, and the rope's elasticity, which can be modeled like a spring. It's crucial to incorporate gravitational acceleration and the rope's length, as these will affect the jump dynamics. Potential energy concepts related to gravity and spring mechanics should be applied to analyze the jump properly. Assumptions about these parameters will help determine if the jump meets safety requirements. Understanding these physics principles is essential for a successful and safe bungee jumping experience.
SChiO
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose you have a friend who wants to go bungee jumping for her birthday. She wants to jump off a high bridge over a river and be able to touch the water below right when she gets to the bottom of the bungee cord extension. You want to double-check all the physics of the bungee jump to make sure it is safe for her to go jumping.



Homework Equations



Identify a few things that you would like to know about the bungee jump. Then, making reasonable assumptions for some of the properties of this system, determine what needs to be true so that she has her birthday wish.


The Attempt at a Solution



I figured what I need to know is the height of the bridge, weight of my friend and the elasticity of the rope which I believe we can assume is similar to a spring. but I know my professor wants us to incorporate potential energy involving a spring and gravity but I'm not sure how to do so...:confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to know the gravitational acceleration of Earth - the same setup will look differently if you perform the jump on the moon. The length of the rope (=the distance below the bridge where it starts to extend) will be relevant, too.

There are many ways to fix all parameters. Potential energy as parameter is an option, but not required.
 
Thanks that makes sense. Hopefully i get it right!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
4K
Back
Top