Using field axioms to prove a set is not a field

  • Thread starter Thread starter notnottrue
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axioms Field Set
notnottrue
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let F = {a + b\sqrt[3]{2}:a,b\inQ}.
Using the fact that \sqrt[3]{2} is irrational, show that F is not a field.

[Hint: What is the inverse of \sqrt[3]{2} under multiplication?]


Homework Equations



For a field,
For all c \in F, there exists c-1 \in F s.t. c*c-1 =1

The Attempt at a Solution



I am unsure how to relate the axioms to the set. Is c = (a +b\sqrt[3]{2})?
Or show there is no b\sqrt[3]{2}*b-1\sqrt[3]{2}=1?
Or b\sqrt[3]{2}*(b\sqrt[3]{2})-1=1?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are lots of ways to go about it, but if you're going to follow the hint, it specifically suggests showing that \sqrt[3]{2} is an element that doesn't have an inverse.
 
\sqrt[3]{2}\inF with a=0 and b=1
So there must be c such that c*\sqrt[3]{2}=1
c=1/\sqrt[3]{2}\notinQ
Since \sqrt[3]{2}\inF, F must not be a field because it has no inverse under multiplication.
Is this sound?
 
Last edited:
Bumb
 
Thread 'Use greedy vertex coloring algorithm to prove the upper bound of χ'
Hi! I am struggling with the exercise I mentioned under "Homework statement". The exercise is about a specific "greedy vertex coloring algorithm". One definition (which matches what my book uses) can be found here: https://people.cs.uchicago.edu/~laci/HANDOUTS/greedycoloring.pdf Here is also a screenshot of the relevant parts of the linked PDF, i.e. the def. of the algorithm: Sadly I don't have much to show as far as a solution attempt goes, as I am stuck on how to proceed. I thought...
Back
Top