Using force equations and kinematic equations

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a 1.0 kg wood block launched up a ramp inclined at a 38-degree angle, with an initial speed of 14 m/s. Participants are tasked with determining the vertical height reached by the block and its speed upon returning to the starting point, incorporating concepts of forces, friction, and kinematics.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore breaking down forces into components and calculating normal force, with varying results. There is discussion about the role of friction and the correct application of kinematic equations. Some participants express confusion about the relationship between distance traveled along the ramp and vertical height, prompting questions about the use of trigonometry.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of different interpretations of the problem, with some participants offering calculations and others questioning the validity of those calculations. Guidance is provided regarding the use of trigonometric relationships to find vertical height based on distance along the ramp.

Contextual Notes

Participants note constraints such as not having covered work and energy concepts, which may limit their approaches. There is also a recognition of potential errors in calculated accelerations and forces, leading to further discussion on how to correctly derive values needed for solving the problem.

aligass2004
Messages
236
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 1.0kg wood block is launched up a wooden ramp that is inclined at a 38 degree angle. The block's initial speed is 14 m/s. (Use uk = .20 for the coefficient of kinetic friction for wood on wood.) a.) What vertical height does the block reach above its starting point? b.) What speed does it have when it slides back down to its starting point?

Homework Equations



F = ma
Frictional force = uk(n)
kinematic equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I broke the weight into its components. Then I found the forces for each direction. I then solved for the normal force, and got 59.249N. I then substituted that in for the equation in the x-direction to find the acceleration. I got -67.179 m/s^2. I then tried using Vxf^2 = Vxi^2 + 2(ax)(delta x).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aligass2004 said:

Homework Statement



A 1.0kg wood block is launched up a wooden ramp that is inclined at a 38 degree angle. The block's initial speed is 14 m/s. (Use uk = .20 for the coefficient of kinetic friction for wood on wood.) a.) What vertical height does the block reach above its starting point? b.) What speed does it have when it slides back down to its starting point?

Homework Equations



F = ma
Frictional force = uk(n)
kinematic equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I broke the weight into its components. Then I found the forces for each direction. I then solved for the normal force, and got 59.249N. I then substituted that in for the equation in the x-direction to find the acceleration. I got -67.179 m/s^2. I then tried using Vxf^2 = Vxi^2 + 2(ax)(delta x).

I cannot see friction in your equations(or method), and normal force cannot be 59 N. It is much smaller
 
Normal - Wy = m(ay) or Normal - mgcos (theta) = m(ay) right?
 
m(ay) is 0
so
N = mgcos theta

N = 1 * g * cos (t)

and how u got >10?
 
The normal force is 7.73N. So now I substitute the normal force into -fricitional force-Wx = m(ax).
 
Are you allowed to use work/energy for this problem?
 
I don't think so. We haven't gone over work or energy yet.
 
aligass2004 said:
The normal force is 7.73N. So now I substitute the normal force into -fricitional force-Wx = m(ax).

yup. this looks right.
 
For the acceleration, I got -7.586 m/s^2. I tried using Vxf^2 = Vxi^2 + 2(ax)(delta x), but it didn't work.
 
  • #10
what did you use for the final velocity?
... by the way, this distance is NOT the height!
 
  • #11
Very good point. I hadn't realized that at first. So how do I go about finding the vertical height?
 
  • #12
aligass2004 said:
Very good point. I hadn't realized that at first. So how do I go about finding the vertical height?

use trig. When you get the distance along the ramp... the height is just dsin(38).
 
  • #13
How do I find the distance? By using Vxf^2 = Vxi^2 + 2(ax)(delta x)?
 
  • #14
I'm still confused about this problem.
 
  • #15
aligass2004 said:
How do I find the distance? By using Vxf^2 = Vxi^2 + 2(ax)(delta x)?

Yes. What did you get for distance?
 
  • #16
I got 1.459m for the distance
 
  • #17
aligass2004 said:
I got 1.459m for the distance

How did you get that? Can you show your calculations?
 
  • #18
Well, I assumed that Vxf would be zero since the block would stop on the ramp. Then I used 14 for Vxi and -67.179 for the acceleration.

-196 = 2(-67.179)deltax
-196 = -134.358deltax
delta x = 1.459
 
  • #19
-67 isn't the right acceleration. how did you get that?
 
  • #20
-(ukn)-Wx = m(ax)
 
  • #21
I've got equations everywhere. I think I may have used the wrong acceleration. The acceleration is -7.586. So, is the distance 12.919m?
 
  • #22
aligass2004 said:
I've got equations everywhere. I think I may have used the wrong acceleration. The acceleration is -7.586. So, is the distance 12.919m?

yeah, that looks better. I'm getting acceleration as -[gsin(38) + uk*gcos(38)] = -7.578 m/s^2.

so height is distance*sin(38)
 
  • #23
I got the height to be 7.954 m. So how do I start part b?
 
  • #24
aligass2004 said:
I got the height to be 7.954 m. So how do I start part b?

find the acceleration. then use that to find the velocity.
 
  • #25
How do I find the acceleration?
 
  • #26
aligass2004 said:
How do I find the acceleration?

same way you got the acceleration before.
 
  • #27
Ok, so the forces in the x direction are the frictional force and the x component of the weight. So the equation would be Fr-Wx = m(ax). And I got the answer to be -4.494.
 
  • #28
aligass2004 said:
Ok, so the forces in the x direction are the frictional force and the x component of the weight. So the equation would be Fr-Wx = m(ax). And I got the answer to be -4.494.

looks right. what do you get for the velocity?
 
  • #29
To find the velocity, I used Vxf^2 = Vxi^2 + 2(ax)(delta x). I got -116.116, but now I'm stuck because you can't take the square root of a negative number.
 
  • #30
Nevermind, I got it. The negative sign is just an indication of direction so I got rid of it, took the square root, and tacked it back on for an answer of -10.776.
 

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
1K
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
2K