Using Ice Tables: When to Use X

  • Thread starter Thread starter merry
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ice
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the appropriate use of an unknown variable (x) versus directly subtracting the concentration of the limiting reagent in chemical reactions. It clarifies that an unknown (x) is typically used when the change in concentration of reactants and products is not straightforward, often in cases where the reaction does not go to completion or when the limiting reagent's concentration significantly affects the equilibrium. In contrast, when the limiting reagent's concentration is low enough to be ignored in mass balance calculations, it can be subtracted directly from the initial concentrations of the reactants. This distinction is crucial for accurately modeling chemical reactions and understanding equilibrium shifts.
merry
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
When do you use an unknown (x) as the change in the concentration of the entities and when do you simply subtract the concentration of the limiting reagent from the initial concentration of the reactants? @.@
Thanks!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
merry said:
When do you use an unknown (x) as the change in the concentration of the entities and when do you simply subtract the concentration of the limiting reagent from the initial concentration of the reactants?

I hope I understand your question correctly, it would be easier if you will give an example.

If you treat something as a limiting reagent it means that for some reason you assume equilibrium in the reaction is shifted so far to the right, that concentration of the limiting reagent in the mixture is so low, it can be ignored in mass balance.

--
methods
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top