Using logs to obtain the slope of a function

  • Thread starter Thread starter thepassenger48
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Slope
thepassenger48
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have to find the slope of an exponential curve by using log identities.

Using basic values such as:
(10, 0.692)
(30, 1.082)
(70, 1.579)

Homework Equations


The equation is in the form T=Cm^p
So the log function is logT=logC + Plog(m) right?

The Attempt at a Solution



When I take the log of (10, 0.692) I end up with negative values, which is completely non-sensical when compared to my experimental values!
I end up with function -.6x^.4
when I should get .3x^.4
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To me there is still a fair bit of ambiguity in the statement of your problem, perhaps if you could elaborate a bit further, it would be easier to assist you. For example, the ordered pair (10, 0.692), what values does this correspond to in the equation? Your formula is certainly right, but I'm not quite following. I assume the abscissa is Temperature, but what's the other?
 
thepassenger48 said:

Homework Statement


I have to find the slope of an exponential curve by using log identities.

Using basic values such as:
(10, 0.692)
(30, 1.082)
(70, 1.579)

Homework Equations


The equation is in the form T=Cm^p
So the log function is logT=logC + Plog(m) right?

The Attempt at a Solution



When I take the log of (10, 0.692) I end up with negative values, which is completely non-sensical when compared to my experimental values!
I end up with function -.6x^.4
when I should get .3x^.4
Why is it non-sensical? you are talking about the logarithm being negative, not the values themselves.

I'm going to assume that the first number in each pair is m, the second number T. As Kreizhn said, it would be good idea to actually put that in your question.

(log 10, log 0.692)= (1, -0.160)
(log 30, log 1.082)= (1.477, 0.0342)
(log 70, log 1.579)= (1.845, 0.198)

slope, P:
(0.198-(-1.60))/(1.845- 1)= 0.358/0.845= 0.424
When m= 10, log 0.692= -.160= log C+ (0.424)log 10= log C+ 0.424 so
log C= -.160- 0.424= -.584 which means C itslelf is less than 1 but positive:
log T= -.584+ 0.424log m so T= 10-.584 m0.424= 0.2550m0.424. Rounded to one decimal place, that is T= .3 m.4.

log C is -.6, C= .3 (again, to one decimal place)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
Why is it non-sensical? you are talking about the logarithm being negative, not the values themselves.

I'm going to assume that the first number in each pair is m, the second number T. As Kreizhn said, it would be good idea to actually put that in your question.

(log 10, log 0.692)= (1, -0.160)
(log 30, log 1.082)= (1.477, 0.0342)
(log 70, log 1.579)= (1.845, 0.198)

slope, P:
(0.198-(-1.60))/(1.845- 1)= 0.358/0.845= 0.424
When m= 10, log 0.692= -.160= log C+ (0.424)log 10= log C+ 0.424 so
log C= -.160- 0.424= -.584 which means C itslelf is less than 1 but positive:
log T= -.584+ 0.424log m so T= 10-.584 m0.424= 0.2550m0.424. Rounded to one decimal place, that is T= .3 m.4.

log C is -.6, C= .3 (again, to one decimal place)

That was a flawless answer. Thank you very much.
I'm sorry for wording my question so poorly.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top