Using suffix notation to find alternative expressions

ppy
Messages
64
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


use the relationship ε_{ijk} ε_{klm}=δ_{il}δ_{jm}-δ_{im}δ_{jl} to find an alternative expression for ε_{ijk}ε_{ilm}. Hence simplify ε_{ijk}ε_{ijm}

2. Homework Equations


I know that the kronecker delta is 1 for i=j and 0 for i not equal to j. and that the alternating tensor is 0 for any I,j,k equal. +1 if (I,j,k)= (1,2,3) or (2,3,1) or (3,1,2) and -1 for (3,2,1) or (1,3,2) 0r (2,1,3). I also know that the alternating tensor is unchanged under cyclic permutations of its suffices. I know I am supposed to use all these facts but I am unsure how.


Help would be appreciated.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi ppy! :smile:
ppy said:
use the relationship ε_{ijk} ε_{klm}=δ_{il}δ_{jm}-δ_{im}δ_{jl} to find an alternative expression for ε_{ijk}ε_{ilm}.

I know that … the alternating tensor is unchanged under cyclic permutations of its suffices.


in εijkεklm, the common index is 3rd and 1st

in εijkεilm, the common index is 1st and 1st

so use a cycllc permutation to make it 3rd and 1st :wink:
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top