Using the equation intensity = power/cross-sectional area

  • Thread starter Thread starter John421
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Intensity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the intensity of light from a 100W lamp at a distance of 1 meter, using the formula intensity = power/cross-sectional area. The surface area of a sphere is given as 4*Pi*r^2, leading to an intensity calculation of approximately 7.96 W/m². There is confusion regarding the terminology, specifically the use of "cross-sectional area" instead of "surface area," as the light spreads uniformly over the sphere's surface. It is clarified that in this context, the cross-sectional area refers to the area over which the light is distributed, which is the entire sphere for a point source. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the terms used in the equation and their application based on the scenario presented.
John421
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Let's say we have the problem: A 100W lamp emits light in all directions. Assuming that the lamp is a point source, calculate the intensity of the radiation 1m away from the lamp.

The surface area of a sphere is :4*Pi*r2
intensity = power/cross-sectional area
The answer is intensity = 100w/4Pi = 7.96

Now what confuses me is that the answer is derived by intensity = power/surface area of the shape the wave makes when it spreads out.

Shouldn't cross-sectional area be the cross-sectional area of a sphere?
I don't see how 4*Pi*r2 is the cross-sectional area in this case.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
4 pi r2 is the surface area of a sphere. Your light will be distributed uniformly over this area.
 
But then why does the formula say cross-sectional area instead of surface area?
 
This is the cross-section of the light with your sphere. It happens to be the whole sphere as you have a point-charge radiating in all directions.
 
If the question were to ask what the intensity of the light was at a screen 1m away from your light source, then you would use the surface area of that screen, not the surface area of your light source (just to be clear on what surface area you are using -- not the surface area of your light source). I just want to ensure you know that the equation uses the cross-sectional area (of the light) interchangeably with the surface area of the *thing* that the light is hitting.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top