Value of Voltage Reflection Coefficient

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the voltage reflection coefficient (VRC) in transmission lines, specifically referencing the formula provided in "Field and Wave Electromagnetics" by David K. Cheng. The VRC is defined as \(\Gamma = \frac{Z_L - Z_0}{Z_L + Z_0}\), where \(Z_0\) is the characteristic impedance and \(Z_L\) is the load impedance. The conversation clarifies that the formula remains valid regardless of whether the distance is measured from the load towards the source or vice versa, with adjustments made for the sign of the distance. The importance of context in defining the coordinate system for \(z\) is also emphasized.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of transmission line theory
  • Familiarity with impedance concepts, specifically characteristic and load impedance
  • Knowledge of complex numbers and exponential notation in electrical engineering
  • Basic grasp of wave propagation in electromagnetic fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the voltage reflection coefficient in practical transmission line applications
  • Explore the concept of wave propagation and attenuation in transmission lines
  • Learn about the impact of load mismatches on signal integrity
  • Investigate advanced topics in electromagnetic theory, particularly in relation to transmission line modeling
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, students of electromagnetic theory, and professionals involved in the design and analysis of transmission lines will benefit from this discussion.

varunag
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
hi

i was studying the "wave characteristics of transmission lines". while considering the lines with resistive termination, the term "voltage reflection coefficient(VRC)" came.
With reference to the book, "Field and Wave Electromagnetics", by David K. Cheng,
the following expression was given for the VRC:
<br /> \Gamma = \frac{Z_L - Z_0}{Z_L + Z_0} = |\Gamma|e^{j\theta_\Gamma}<br />
<br /> Z_0\text{ is the characteristic impedance, and } Z_L\text{ is the load impedance.}<br />

This was when, the distance on the line was measured from the load towards the source.
I wanted to know whether the same formula holds if we measure the distance from source towards the load. I was trying to find the same and would still be trying out, but thought it would be good to know more... (you always get to know more than what you want at PF)

regards,
varunag
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi Varun, good to see you on PF. How are you these days? :-)

Well, since you're following Cheng, I will also use the convention he's used:

\Gamma(z) = \frac{V^{-}e^{\gamma z}}{V^{+}e^{-\gamma z}}

here z = 0 corresponds to the load. So at the load,

\Gamma_{L} = \frac{V^{-}}{V^{+}} = \frac{Z_L - Z_0}{Z_L + Z_0} = |\Gamma_{L}|e^{j\theta_\Gamma_{L}}

Distances towards the source are along negative z, so at a distance z' from the load, the coordinate z = -z' and so

\Gamma(z=-z&#039;) = \Gamma_{L}e^{-2\gamma z&#039;}

which implies that

\Gamma(z=-z&#039;) = |\Gamma_{L}|e^{j\theta_\Gamma_{L}-2\gamma z&#039;}

I guess this is what you were looking for.

Note: We need to be careful when writing \Gamma(z&#039;). Depending on the context, it could correspond to a distance z' from the load (which would imply that this is an implicit notation for z = -z' and the minus sign has been suppressed for convenience) or the coordinate z = +z'. Both mean totally different things.

Hope that helps.
 
thanks maverick, for the prompt reply.

a few things i have understood after reading your post and then the book:
1. The VRC I've mentioned, is the "voltage reflection coefficient" of the load impedance Z_L.
2. The formula does depend on the choice of our z. And I was earlier making some mistake when I was trying to find \Gamma using z going from source to load. Although later I was able to find \Gamma correctly. :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
705
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K