Value of Voltage Reflection Coefficient

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the voltage reflection coefficient (VRC) in transmission lines, specifically its calculation using the formula Γ = (Z_L - Z_0) / (Z_L + Z_0). The user seeks clarification on whether this formula applies when measuring distance from the source to the load instead of the load to the source. It is confirmed that the formula does hold, but the interpretation of the distance variable z must be carefully considered, as it can lead to different results. The user acknowledges a previous misunderstanding regarding the direction of measurement but has since corrected it. Understanding the context of z is crucial for accurate calculations of the VRC.
varunag
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
hi

i was studying the "wave characteristics of transmission lines". while considering the lines with resistive termination, the term "voltage reflection coefficient(VRC)" came.
With reference to the book, "Field and Wave Electromagnetics", by David K. Cheng,
the following expression was given for the VRC:
<br /> \Gamma = \frac{Z_L - Z_0}{Z_L + Z_0} = |\Gamma|e^{j\theta_\Gamma}<br />
<br /> Z_0\text{ is the characteristic impedance, and } Z_L\text{ is the load impedance.}<br />

This was when, the distance on the line was measured from the load towards the source.
I wanted to know whether the same formula holds if we measure the distance from source towards the load. I was trying to find the same and would still be trying out, but thought it would be good to know more... (you always get to know more than what you want at PF)

regards,
varunag
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi Varun, good to see you on PF. How are you these days? :-)

Well, since you're following Cheng, I will also use the convention he's used:

\Gamma(z) = \frac{V^{-}e^{\gamma z}}{V^{+}e^{-\gamma z}}

here z = 0 corresponds to the load. So at the load,

\Gamma_{L} = \frac{V^{-}}{V^{+}} = \frac{Z_L - Z_0}{Z_L + Z_0} = |\Gamma_{L}|e^{j\theta_\Gamma_{L}}

Distances towards the source are along negative z, so at a distance z' from the load, the coordinate z = -z' and so

\Gamma(z=-z&#039;) = \Gamma_{L}e^{-2\gamma z&#039;}

which implies that

\Gamma(z=-z&#039;) = |\Gamma_{L}|e^{j\theta_\Gamma_{L}-2\gamma z&#039;}

I guess this is what you were looking for.

Note: We need to be careful when writing \Gamma(z&#039;). Depending on the context, it could correspond to a distance z' from the load (which would imply that this is an implicit notation for z = -z' and the minus sign has been suppressed for convenience) or the coordinate z = +z'. Both mean totally different things.

Hope that helps.
 
thanks maverick, for the prompt reply.

a few things i have understood after reading your post and then the book:
1. The VRC I've mentioned, is the "voltage reflection coefficient" of the load impedance Z_L.
2. The formula does depend on the choice of our z. And I was earlier making some mistake when I was trying to find \Gamma using z going from source to load. Although later I was able to find \Gamma correctly. :smile:
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
Back
Top