Variable Magnetic field bound in a cylindrical region

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the line integral of the electric field in a cylindrical region with a variable magnetic field. The integral is evaluated using Gauss's law and Faraday's law of induction, leading to a conclusion that the correct answer is option D, which is ##\frac{\pi}{8}(B_0 a^2)##. Participants express confusion about the solution booklet's steps, particularly regarding the relationship between the line integral and the magnetic flux. The concept of symmetry in electric field lines around the cylinder is emphasized, and it is clarified that the method applies regardless of the specific path, as long as the enclosed flux is considered. The discussion concludes with an affirmation of the method's validity when applying it to different geometrical configurations within the cylindrical region.
Saitama
Messages
4,244
Reaction score
93

Homework Statement


There is a uniform but variable magnetic field ##\vec{B}=(B_0 t)(-\hat{k})##, in a cylindrical region, whose boundary is described by ##x^2+y^2=a^2##. ##\displaystyle \int_P^{Q} \vec{E} \cdot \vec{dy}## is (see attachment 1)
A)0
B)##\frac{\pi}{4}(B_0 a^2)##
C)##-\frac{\pi}{8}(B_0 a^2)##
D)##\frac{\pi}{8}(B_0 a^2)##


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


(see attachment 2)
The electric field produced will be in anticlockwise direction. At a distance y from P, the electric field can be calculated using Gauss's law.
E \cdot 2\pi \sqrt{4a^2+y^2}=B_0 \pi a^2
E=\frac{B_0 a^2}{2\sqrt{4a^2+y^2}}

Since y is in the vertical direction, we need to only consider the vertical component to evaluate the integral asked in the question.
\int_{P}^{Q} \vec{E}\cdot \vec{dy}=\int_0^{2a} E\cos \theta dy
=\int_0^{2a} \frac{B_0 a^2}{2\sqrt{4a^2+y^2}} \cdot \frac{2a}{\sqrt{4a^2+y^2}} dy

Solving the integral, I get D which is correct.

The problem is I don't understand what the solution booklet has mentioned. The solution goes like this: (see attachment 3)

\int_{P}^Q \vec{E} \cdot \vec{dy}=\frac{1}{8}[\vec{E} \cdot \vec{dl} \text{ for square } TQRST]
=\frac{1}{8} \frac{d[\pi a^4B_0t]}{dt}
=\frac{\pi}{8}B_0 a^2

I don't understand how they even got the first two steps. :confused:

Any explanation on this would be helpful. Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • att1.png
    att1.png
    10.4 KB · Views: 484
  • att2.png
    att2.png
    11.8 KB · Views: 474
  • att3.png
    att3.png
    5.8 KB · Views: 492
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
See the line integral from P to Q is one eight of the whole perimeter of the square...So the first line is written..It is similar like the electric flux concept which we use...In the second line...it should be a^2
 
BBAI BBAI said:
See the line integral from P to Q is one eight of the whole perimeter of the square...So the first line is written..It is similar like the electric flux concept which we use...In the second line...it should be a^2

Yes, it should be a^2, sorry for the typo but I am not yet able to understand why the method works. :confused:
 
See, if you have solved the sum of electric flux( i.e flux through one face of a cube containing a charge Q inside it.=Q/6e0) you can understand.The similar follows here...Instead of Surface integral here is the line integral..
 
Solve it by using Faraday's Low of Induction

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/maxeq2.html#c3.

The electric field lines are circles around the cylinder. The line integral for a whole circle is equal to the negative of the derivative of magnetic flux inside. It does not depend on the actual path. You can use symmetry to calculate the integral for the given path.

ehild
 
Last edited:
ehild said:
Solve it by using Faraday's Low of Induction

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/maxeq2.html#c3.
I did use the integral form to get the magnitude of electric field.

ehild said:
The electric field lines are circles around the cylinder. The line integral for a whole circle is equal to the negative of the derivative of magnetic flux inside. It does not depend on the actual path. You can use symmetry to calculate the integral for the given path.

ehild

I am not sure if I get it but what about the case when the square shown in attachment 3 lies inside the circle ##x^2+y^2=a^2##? Would the same method still apply?

Thanks!
 
The enclosed flux counts.

ehild
 
ehild said:
The enclosed flux counts.

ehild

For instance if I inscribe a square of side a/√2 in the given circular region, the line integral for that square would be ##\frac{d\phi}{dt}## where ##\phi=(B_0t)(a^2/2)##. Is this correct?

Thanks!
 
Yes.
 
  • #10
ehild said:
Yes.

Thanks a lot ehild! :smile:
 
Back
Top