Vector Addition. Where did I go wrong?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the displacement of a car driven 225 km west and then 98 km southwest. The initial attempt at solving the problem was incorrect due to errors in vector component calculations, particularly with signs and the use of Pythagorean theorem. The correct approach involves breaking down the 98 km vector into its vertical and horizontal components and then adding these to the components of the 225 km vector. The final displacement can be determined using the Pythagorean theorem and calculating the direction with the arctangent function. The expected result is a displacement of 302 km at an angle of 32° south of west.
Scorry
Messages
17
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A car is driven 225 km west and then 98 km southwest (45 degrees). What is the displacement of the car from the point (magnitude and direction)? Draw a diagram.

Homework Equations


Vectors have magnitude and direction.

The Attempt at a Solution


My attempt is attached. This a homework problem. My textbook only has the answer as : 302 km, 32° south of west. What am I doing wrong ?
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
In calculating ##D_R## you did ##(156^2-69^2)## instead of ##(156^2+(-69)^2)##
 
Thanks for the response. In my Ti 89 that gives me a magnitude of 170.578 Km. Did you get 302 km?
 
Scorry said:
Thanks for the response. In my Ti 89 that gives me a magnitude of 170.578 Km. Did you get 302 km?
The 156 is also incorrect.

45° is not consistent with 180°.

By the way: Welcome to PF !
 
The sign of D1x is wrong. From the diagram, you can see that if is -225.

Chet
 
You can make it a lot easier on yourself by leaving the trig until the very last step when you work out the direction of the resulting vector. All the rest can be done by Pythagoras Theorem. Work out the vert and horizontal components of the 98km vector as each ##\frac{98km}{\sqrt{2}}##, then add each to the vert and horiz components of the 225km vector. Then use Pythag to calc the length of that resulting vector from its V and H components. The direction is then calculated as ##\arctan\frac{vertical\ compt}{horiz\ component}##. You may need to add or subtract that from 180 degrees, but it will be obvious from the diagram what you need to do, once you've got the angle.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top