Vector calculus: how to order terms?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the manipulation of a complex operator involving angular momentum in vector calculus. The operator is expressed as \(\vec{u}\cdot\left[\vec{L}\times\left(\vec{u}_r\times\vec{L}\right)\right]f\), where \(\vec{L}\) is the angular momentum operator and \(\vec{u}_r\) is a unit vector in spherical coordinates. The final resolved expression is \(\vec{u}\cdot\left[\left(\check{\vec{L}}\check{\vec{u}_r}\right)^T\cdot\vec{L}-\left(\check{\vec{L}} \cdot \check{\vec{u}_r}\right)\vec{L}+\vec{u}_r \left(\check{\vec{L}}\cdot \check{\vec{L}}\right)-\left(\vec{u}_r \cdot \check{\vec{L}}\right)\check{\vec{L}}\right]f\). The use of Mathematica was recommended for verifying results in similar problems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus concepts, particularly angular momentum operators.
  • Familiarity with tensor algebra and anti-symmetric properties.
  • Proficiency in using Mathematica for mathematical computations.
  • Knowledge of spherical coordinate systems and their applications in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore advanced vector calculus techniques involving angular momentum operators.
  • Learn about tensor operations and their significance in physics.
  • Study the capabilities of Mathematica for symbolic computation and verification of mathematical expressions.
  • Investigate the implications of anti-symmetry in tensor products and operator ordering.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers dealing with vector calculus and angular momentum, as well as students seeking to deepen their understanding of tensor algebra and computational tools like Mathematica.

giokara
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I need to let an operator act on a scalar function. The operator is however in a very cryptic form, so I would want to work it out a little bit. I get stuck in the process. The operator is:

[itex]\vec{u}\cdot\left[\vec{L}\times\left(\vec{u}_r\times\vec{L}\right)\right]f[/itex]

Where [itex]\vec{L}[/itex] is the angular momentum operator and [itex]\vec{u}_r[/itex] is the unit vector along the [itex]r[/itex]-direction in a spherical coordinate system. [itex]\vec{u}[/itex] is just a constant vector.
The outer [itex]\vec{L}[/itex] needs to work on both the [itex]\vec{u}_r[/itex] and the inner [itex]\vec{L}[/itex], so I write:

[itex]\vec{u}\cdot\left[\check{\vec{u}_r}\left(\check{\vec{L}}\cdot\vec{L}\right)-\left(\check{\vec{L}} \cdot \check{\vec{u}_r}\right)\vec{L}+\vec{u}_r \left(\check{\vec{L}}\cdot \check{\vec{L}}\right)-\left(\vec{u}_r \cdot \check{\vec{L}}\right)\check{\vec{L}}\right]f[/itex][itex][/itex]

where the upside-down hat denotes the vector on which the [itex]\check{\vec{L}}[/itex] operator acts. In the last three terms the ordering of the operators is correct.
For the first term I do not see how to let [itex]\check{\vec{L}}[/itex] operate on [itex]\check{\vec{u}_r}[/itex] without the second [itex]\vec{L}[/itex] operator acting on it as well. My best guess is to make a tensor term of the sort

[itex]\left(\check{\vec{L}}\check{\vec{u}_r}\right)\cdot\vec{L}[/itex]

but I'm not sure about the ordering of the terms in this expression. I have checked the tensor and it is anti-symmetric, so the ordering will make a difference.

Any suggestions are welcome, thanks in advance!

Giorgos
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem is solved in the meanwhile. The result is

[itex]\vec{u}\cdot\left[\left(\check{\vec{L}}\check{\vec{u}_r}\right)^T\cdot\vec{L}-\left(\check{\vec{L}} \cdot \check{\vec{u}_r}\right)\vec{L}+\vec{u}_r \left(\check{\vec{L}}\cdot \check{\vec{L}}\right)-\left(\vec{u}_r \cdot \check{\vec{L}}\right)\check{\vec{L}}\right]f[/itex]

For people who would meet such problems in the future, I strongly advice you to use Mathematica to check the results. In this case it saved me...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K