Vector Projection Problem: Solving for Component in Given Direction

  • Thread starter Thread starter Allenman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Component Vector
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a vector projection problem presented in a CEE 270 exam, where a force vector F has a specified component in the direction of another vector P. The main confusion stems from whether a coordinate system rotation is necessary to solve for the unknown component F_y. The professor clarified that no rotation is needed, which led to further inquiries about how to approach the problem. Participants highlighted that recognizing the problem as a vector projection is key to finding the solution. Understanding vector projections is essential for solving this type of problem effectively.
Allenman
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
This question was just given on a CEE 270 exam (handwritten by professor). The way it's written doesn't make any sense to me.

Homework Statement



A force vector
\vec{F} = (70.0 \hat{i} + F_{y} \hat{j} + 140.0 \hat{k} ) N​

has a component of +20.0 N in the direction defined by the vector
\vec{P} = (6 \hat{i} - 3 \hat{j} - 2 \hat{k} ) kN​

Solve for F_{y}.

The Attempt at a Solution



I asked the professor if I needed to rotate the coordinate system as the question states that a component of \vec{F} is in the \vec{P} direction. He said no rotation of the coordinate system should be needed.

I am very confused at how to even approach this problem. Please help. Does it even make sense?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem makes sense. When you want to know the projection of one vector onto another, what vector operation comes to mind?
 
Wow... I didn't recognize it as a vector projection problem... Thank you!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top