Vector Proof Homework: Show Invariance of Distance from Origin

  • Thread starter Thread starter uchicago2012
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Vector
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the invariance of the distance from the origin in a rotated coordinate system. Participants are tasked with demonstrating that the distance formula remains unchanged despite the transformation of coordinates. A key point raised is the importance of expanding the right side of the equation and recognizing the utility of the trigonometric identity cos²θ + sin²θ = 1. There is a noted mistake in the sign during the expansion, which affects the outcome, highlighting the need for careful algebraic manipulation. The conversation emphasizes the relationship between vector components and their invariance under rotation.
uchicago2012
Messages
74
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An (x,y) coordinate system is rotated through an angle theta to produce an (x',y') system, see figure.
A point with coordinates (x,y) will have coordinates (x',y') in the rotated system given by:
x'1 = (x1 * cos theta) + (y1 * sin theta)
y'1 = (-x1 * sin theta) + (y1 * cos theta)
Show that the formula for the distance of the point from the origin is invariant, or unchanged, by the rotation. That is, show:
sqrt (x12 + y12) = sqrt (x'12 + y'12)


Homework Equations


I don't know if these are really relevant, I just thought so:
ax = a cos theta
ay = a sin theta
a = sqrt (ax2 + ay2)
tan theta = ay/ax
where a = the magnitude of vector a and theta = the angle vector a makes with the positive direction of the x axis

The Attempt at a Solution


So I thought this was asking, more or less, to prove that rotating the axes changes the components of the vector but not the vector itself.

I set the two equations given equal to each other, subbing in the information given for x' and y', but I don't know how to proceed or even if this was a good place to start. Any ideas for starting off?

sqrt (x12 + y12) = sqrt (((x1 * cos theta) + (y1 * sin theta))2 + ((-x1 * sin theta) + (y1 * cos theta))2)
 

Attachments

  • Figure1.jpg
    Figure1.jpg
    8.6 KB · Views: 365
Physics news on Phys.org
uchicago2012 said:
So I thought this was asking, more or less, to prove that rotating the axes changes the components of the vector but not the vector itself.

I set the two equations given equal to each other, subbing in the information given for x' and y', but I don't know how to proceed or even if this was a good place to start. Any ideas for starting off?

sqrt (x12 + y12) = sqrt (((x1 * cos theta) + (y1 * sin theta))2 + ((-x1 * sin theta) + (y1 * cos theta))2)
'Looks good to me so far. :approve:

Leave the left side of the equation alone. Start expanding the right side. See if any terms cancel out as you go. :wink: Eventually you will find the trig identity,

\cos^2 \theta + \sin^2 \theta = 1

quite useful.
 
So I worked on the given equation, simplifying until I got:

(x12 + y12)1/2 = ( (x1 * cos theta)2 + (x1 sin theta)2 + 4(x1 * cos theta * y1 * sin theta) + (y1 * sin theta)2 + (y1 * cos theta)2 )1/2

But I don't see where to go from here. I feel as if I should be able to see a2 + b2 (as in the Pythagorean theorem) in this mess, but I don't see it. Perhaps that's just off base anyway and I just haven't done enough algebra.
 
uchicago2012 said:
So I worked on the given equation, simplifying until I got:

(x12 + y12)1/2 = ( (x1 * cos theta)2 + (x1 sin theta)2 + 4(x1 * cos theta * y1 * sin theta) + (y1 * sin theta)2 + (y1 * cos theta)2 )1/2

But I don't see where to go from here. I feel as if I should be able to see a2 + b2 (as in the Pythagorean theorem) in this mess, but I don't see it. Perhaps that's just off base anyway and I just haven't done enough algebra.
The term in red involves a little mistake. But that little mistake makes a big difference.

Here's a hint. In your original substitution,

\sqrt{\left( x_1 \cos \theta + y_1 \sin \theta \right) ^2 + \left( {\color{red}{-}} x_1 \sin \theta + y_1 \cos \theta \right) ^2},

the x1sinθ has a negative sign attached to it (in red, directly above). However, when you expanded all the terms, everything somehow ended up positive (which is where the mistake fits in). :wink:
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top