Vector Question: Solved - Learn What to Look For

  • Thread starter Thread starter TS656577
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vector
AI Thread Summary
Vectors can indeed have units, particularly when they represent physical quantities like force, which is measured in Newtons (N). Unit vectors themselves do not have units, but they are often used to express the direction of a vector that does have units. In the context of the problem involving a 1.38 kg box, the force acting on it is expressed in Newtons, and thus the second force should also be in units of N. The discussion clarifies that while unit vectors are dimensionless, the vectors they represent can carry physical units. Understanding this distinction is crucial for correctly solving physics problems involving vectors.
TS656577
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Vector Question

Im doing my homework online because that's where it needs to be done. For answers with unit vector notation in them, I thought that vectors didnt have units. When I put them into the program and select these don't have units...they get marked wrong. Do they have units?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A unit vector is different from a physical unit. Certainly a vector can have a physical unit attached to it. For instance a force is a vector quantity and as you may know, force is measured in units of Newtons (N).
 
There are two forces on the 1.38 kg box in the overhead view of Fig. 5-31 but only one is shown. For F1 = 18.4 N, a = 13.6 m/s2, and θ = 29.2°, find the second force (a) in unit-vector notation. So would the units for A be N??
 
By the way. I am not asking the problem to be done...I just need units
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top