Vectors delta velocity calculations

NMann
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Two waves originated from point A and point B, waves are 'velocity-direction-dependent', can be treated as 'vectors', it took t2 time for the wave from point B to reach A, and it took time t2 for the wave from point B to reach A.

Given the fact the two vectors have the same 'magnitude', and only the t1 and t2 are known is there a way to calculate delta velocity?



A>>>>>>>>>>> B, in t1 time
B>>>>>>>>>>> A, in t2 time

Distance between A and B is constant, and only known variables are t1 and t2, is there a way to calculate Δv?


thank you!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
NMann said:
Distance between A and B is constant

Is it a known constant value? - or it is an unknown value, just known to be some constant?
 
If the distance from B to A is d, then the first wave, taking t1 to go from B to A, has speed d/t1. The second wave, taking t2 to go from B to A, has speed d/t2. The "\Delta v" is d/t1- d/t2= d(t2- t1)/t1t2.
If you do not know the distance from B to A, then you cannot calculate \Delta v.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top