Velocity/Acceleration relation w/ constants

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the acceleration of a particle based on its velocity-position relationship, expressed as v² = w²(A² - x²). Participants explore methods for differentiating this equation, debating whether to differentiate with respect to time or position. The consensus leans towards differentiating with respect to position for a quicker solution, leading to the conclusion that acceleration can be expressed as a = -w²x. Clarifications on notation and the application of the chain rule are also discussed, emphasizing the importance of proper mathematical representation. The conversation highlights the collaborative effort to understand the derivation process in physics.
snovak216
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The velocity of a particle is related to its position by: v2 = w2 (A2 - x2) where w and A are constants. Show that the acceleration is given by: a=-w2x[/B]

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



a= v* dv/dt

v=(A2w2-x2w2)1/2

dv/dt= 1/2 (A2w2-x2w2)-1/2 * -2xw2

v * dv/dt = 1/2*-2xw2 * (A2w2-x2w2)1/2/ (A2w2-x2w2)-1/2

-w2x

I think this is the proper way of showing the acceleration, but I'm not 100% with my chain rule and cancellations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
snovak216 said:
a= v* dv/dt
I think not.
 
haruspex said:
I think not.

Sorry, I looked at v* dv/dx. Now definitely not sure how to go about it.
 
snovak216 said:
Sorry, I looked at v* dv/dx. Now definitely not sure how to go about it.
What do you get if you simply differentiate the given equation wrt time?
 
haruspex said:
What do you get if you simply differentiate the given equation wrt time?

Wouldn't we have to differentiate wrt x? As t doesn't appear in the equation.
 
snovak216 said:
Wouldn't we have to differentiate wrt x? As t doesn't appear in the equation.
Either will work, but you're right that differentiating wrt x is quicker here - so do it.
 
After eliminating the ^2,

v= w * √(a^2 - x^2)

dv/dx= -xw/ √(a^2-x^2)
 
snovak216 said:
After eliminating the ^2,
No need - just differentiate as is.
 
I think I understand the derivation, but I do not understand the notation for v^2 and a

v^2*dv/dx
2v/dx? = 2w(a^2-x^2)+ w^2(2a -2x)

but since 2w and 2a are constants,

so 2v/dx?= w^2*-2x

dividing by 2

v/dx= -xw^2

and, however notation allows, the v/dx? is equivalent to a.

therefore a= -xw^2
 
  • #10
snovak216 said:
v^2*dv/dx
No, you want ##\frac d{dx} v^2##. Apply the chain rule.
 
  • #11
2v * dv/dx= 0*(a^2-x^2)+ w^2*(0 -2x)= w^2*-2x

2v dv/dx = -2x*w^2

v dv/dx = -x*w^2

where
v dv/dx= a?
 
  • #12
snovak216 said:
2v * dv/dx= 0*(a^2-x^2)+ w^2*(0 -2x)= w^2*-2x

2v dv/dx = -2x*w^2

v dv/dx = -x*w^2

where
v dv/dx= a?
Yes.
 
  • #13
I appreciate the help, it's nice to be walked through the proper notation.
 
Back
Top