Velocity and position from forces with mixed dependences

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a classical mechanics problem involving a particle influenced by a force defined as ##\vec{F}(t,v)=-ktv \hat{v}##, where ##k## is a positive constant. Participants calculated the velocity of the particle ##\vec{v}(t)##, determined the time it takes for the particle to stop, and discussed how to find the maximum x-position reached by the particle. Key insights include the necessity of separating variables before integration and the use of Wolfram Alpha for evaluating complex integrals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Laws of Motion
  • Familiarity with vector calculus
  • Knowledge of integration techniques, particularly with respect to variable separation
  • Experience using computational tools like Wolfram Alpha
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to separate variables in differential equations
  • Study Gaussian integrals and their applications in physics
  • Explore advanced integration techniques using Wolfram Alpha
  • Review classical mechanics problems involving forces and motion
USEFUL FOR

Students in junior-level classical mechanics courses, physics tutors, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of motion under variable forces.

QuantumCurt
Education Advisor
Messages
726
Reaction score
166

Homework Statement



This is for a junior level classical mechanics course. We're currently working with Newton's Laws.

A particle of mass m moves under the influence of a force ##\vec{F}(t,v)=-ktv \hat{v}##, where k is a positive constant. At time t=0, ##v=v_0 \hat{x}## at the origin, where ##v_0## is a positive constant.

a. Calculate the velocity of the particle ##\vec{v}(t)## for times t>0.

b. How much time does it take for the particle to stop?

c. What is the maximum x-position reached by the particle? Hint: you will need to look up ##\int_{0}^{\infty} (something) dt## on Wolfram Alpha, which is a tool that you should take the time to learn how to use!

Homework Equations



$$\vec{F}=m \frac{dv}{dt}$$

The Attempt at a Solution



For part a I figured that since F=m dv/dt, I could simply rewrite this as
$$-ktv \hat{v}=m \frac{dv}{dt}$$
And then solve for v

$$\frac{dv}{dt}=\frac{-ktv \hat{v}}{m}$$

$$\int{dv}=\int{\frac{-ktv \hat{v}}{m}}dt$$

$$\int{dv}=\frac{-kv \hat{v}}{m} \int{t}~dt~\hat{v}$$

So,

$$v=-\frac{kv~\hat{v}}{2m}t^2+v_0 \hat{x}$$

Where ##v_0 \hat{x}## is the constant of integration evaluated at time t=0.

Then for part b, I used this equation and set v=0, and arrived at

$$t=\sqrt{\frac{2v_0m}{kv}}$$

This seemed okay to me, but for part c it specifies that we're going to want to look up an integral. Obviously I can integrate velocity to obtain position, but the simplicity of the integral, along with the recommendation to use Wolfram Alpha, makes me think I'm doing something wrong. If anyone has any input, it would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
QuantumCurt said:
$$\frac{dv}{dt}=\frac{-ktv \hat{v}}{m}$$

$$\int{dv}=\int{\frac{-ktv \hat{v}}{m}}dt$$

$$\int{dv}=\frac{-kv \hat{v}}{m} \int{t}~dt~\hat{v}$$
.

First off, you should be clear that you have vectors on both sides of the equation, though maybe you just had problems making this clear in the LaTeX codes. Second, and more important for this problem, here ##v=v(t)##, so we can't just pull it out of the integral. Instead you should have separated variables before the integration by writing

$$\frac{1}{v} \frac{dv}{dt}=\frac{-kt}{m}.$$

You can then integrate both sides of this. For part (c), it looks like you will get an incomplete Gaussian integral, which is why they suggest using wolframalpha to get a numerical result for it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: QuantumCurt
I actually realized my mistake shortly after posting this. It was indeed what you're referring to. I managed to get it figured out though. Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
984
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
803
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K