Velocity of a Ball Thrown from a Building

  • Thread starter Thread starter chawki
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air Ball
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a ball thrown from the top of a 48 m tall building with an initial velocity of 12 m/s. The main question is to determine the velocity of the ball when it reaches the ground, considering the effects of gravity.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various equations of motion, particularly those involving constant acceleration. Some suggest using equations that relate initial and final velocities with displacement, while others question the assumptions about direction and the height the ball reaches after being thrown upwards.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the equations involved. Some have provided guidance on the correct forms of the equations, while others are clarifying the implications of the signs used in calculations. There is no explicit consensus on the final approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of initial velocity direction and its impact on the equations used. There is an emphasis on understanding the role of gravitational acceleration and the importance of sign conventions in the equations of motion.

  • #31
i think it's -12 in the case of free fall ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
chawki said:
i think it's -12 in the case of free fall ?
"Free fall" just means that the only force acting is gravity. However you throw the ball--up, down, or sideways--once it leaves your hand it's in free fall. (Ignoring air resistance, of course.)
 
  • #33
That's confusing :(
in another problem, there was an object at the roof of a building, then it falls..
they asked the time it takes the object to reach the ground..and if i use (as you told me)
h=-1/2*V*t^2 ..i won't get t...
my mind is messed now
 
  • #34
and same thing if i want to find the velocity when that object hits the ground...
 
  • #35
chawki said:
That's confusing :(
in another problem, there was an object at the roof of a building, then it falls..
they asked the time it takes the object to reach the ground..and if i use (as you told me)
h=-1/2*V*t^2 ..i won't get t...
my mind is messed now
To be consistent, you should use:
Δh = -1/2gt^2

Works fine. What would you use for Δh?

(If you let down be positive, then you can use h = 1/2gt^2. But let's get the standard convention straight before changing things.)
 
  • #36
chawki said:
and same thing if i want to find the velocity when that object hits the ground...
What equation are you using?
 
  • #37
Doc Al said:
To be consistent, you should use:
Δh = -1/2gt^2

Works fine. What would you use for Δh?

(If you let down be positive, then you can use h = 1/2gt^2. But let's get the standard convention straight before changing things.)

Δh=final distance-initial distance
but since you talked about the possibility of writing h = 1/2gt^2 , please please please tell me what i should change in the equations that i wrote in post #30
i prefer using down as positive direction
 
  • #38
chawki said:
i prefer using down as positive direction
Why?
 
  • #39
Doc Al said:
Why?

i guess that way he doesn't have to worry about sign of g

i also used to do it when i started studying physics
 
  • #40
Doc Al said:
Why?

i just prefer...i used to it when i was at school...and i have an important exam to take..and not enough time to revise everything..and using the down direction as negative will just add more stress on me and confuse me more
 
  • #41
cupid.callin said:
i guess that way he doesn't have to worry about sign of g

i also used to do it when i started studying physics

yes ..thank you...you are right...i don't want to take care about the sign of g or V...i just want the correct equations for ''down as positive''
 
  • #42
cupid.callin said:
i guess that way he doesn't have to worry about sign of g
If you use a standard sign convention, you never have to worry about the direction of gravity.
i also used to do it when i started studying physics
Sure, me too. But I strongly suggest that one learn the standard method that applies to all problems. Once you've mastered that, then you can take short cuts.
 
  • #43
chawki said:
yes ..thank you...you are right...i don't want to take care about the sign of g or V...i just want the correct equations for ''down as positive''
Here's how to figure it out:

Start with the general equations for uniformly accelerated motion. You can find them here: https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=905663&postcount=2"

To apply them to free fall with down = positive, use a = g.
To apply them to free fall with up = positive, use a = -g.

Done!

(But don't be surprised if you mess things up, since now you have to remember multiple equations. The 'down as positive' method is fine when nothing changes direction, such as when you throw something downward. Not so good when you throw things up, since they then come down.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #44
Doc Al said:
If you use a standard sign convention, you never have to worry about the direction of gravity.

Sure, me too. But I strongly suggest that one learn the standard method that applies to all problems. Once you've mastered that, then you can take short cuts.

i know what you mean...but I DON'T HAVE TIME :(
 
  • #45
cupid.callin please HELLP ME if you have the equation for both cases (free falls, throwing downward) and (throwing upward)
 
  • #46


Here you go:

chawki said:
Let me get this right,
in case of falls and throwing down with initial speed, the equations are:
h=1/2*g*t2+V0*t
V=g*t+V0
V2-V02=-2*g*Δh ?

in case of throwing the ball upward, the equations are:
h=-1/2*g*t2+V0*t
V=-g*t+V0
V2-V02=-2*g*Δh ?
Here are the equations if up = positive (a = -g):
y = y0 + v0t - 1/2gt^2
(or Δh = v0t - 1/2gt^2)
v = v0 - gt
V2-V02 = -2*g*Δh

If you prefer down = positive, just change the sign of g (a = +g):
Here are the equations if up = positive:
y = y0 + v0t + 1/2gt^2
(or Δh = v0t + 1/2gt^2)
v = v0 + gt
V2-V02 = 2*g*Δh
 
  • #47
DOC AL is helping you and you are asking for my help ...

He is far more intelligent that both of us combined (Thats why he's a mentor ... LOL)

Anyway ...

these 3 eqn's will solve all your problems (provided you use them correctly)

v = u + at
s = ut + 0.5at2
v2 = u2 + 2as

and always remember that v,u,a,s (and s is displacement not distance)are all vectors (not used as vectors there though)

do it simple and step by step

lets do a question ...

suppose you throw a ball up with speed 50 m/s ... what will be its speed and height after 2 sec

(use appropriate eqn and solve)
 
  • #48
cupid.callin said:
DOC AL is helping you and you are asking for my help ...

He is far more intelligent that both of us combined (Thats why he's a mentor ... LOL)

Anyway ...

these 3 eqn's will solve all your problems (provided you use them correctly)

v = u + at
s = ut + 0.5at2
v2 = u2 + 2as

and always remember that v,u,a,s (and s is displacement not distance)are all vectors (not used as vectors there though)

do it simple and step by step

lets do a question ...

suppose you throw a ball up with speed 50 m/s ... what will be its speed and height after 2 sec

(use appropriate eqn and solve)

y=1/2*g*t2+V0*t = 119.62 m
V=g*t+V0=69.62 m/s
 
  • #49
chawki said:
y=1/2*g*t2+V0*t = 119.62 m
V=g*t+V0=69.62 m/s

So you think if i launch something with m/s upwards .. it will increase its speed?

you you can go into space by just jumping ...?

Imagine the problem ... how it will proceed

and if vo is positive then g will be ?
 
  • #50
cupid.callin said:
So you think if i launch something with m/s upwards .. it will increase its speed?

you you can go into space by just jumping ...?

Imagine the problem ... how it will proceed

and if vo is positive then g will be ?

i think that if vo is positive then g will be negative
y=-1/2*g*t2+V0*t = 80.38 m
V=-gt+v0 = 30.38 m/s
 
  • #51
yes now its correct
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K