Velocity of efflux in a piston cylinder arrangement.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the velocity of efflux from a pipe situated on a piston in a piston-cylinder arrangement. Participants explore various approaches to derive this velocity, considering factors such as fluid dynamics, pressure, and the geometry of the system. The conversation includes attempts at mathematical derivations and clarifications of the underlying principles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents derivations for the velocity of efflux but expresses doubt about the assumptions made regarding the height of fluid particles.
  • Another participant critiques the clarity and utility of the presented derivations, suggesting that the flow rate should equal the rate of volume displacement for an incompressible fluid.
  • Concerns are raised about the ill-defined nature of the scenario, particularly the inability to determine flow rate without knowing the area of the pipe.
  • Some participants argue that using acceleration calculations may not be appropriate unless significant forces are involved, suggesting that Bernoulli's principle might be a better approach to find the velocity.
  • There is acknowledgment of errors in the mathematical formulations presented, with one participant admitting to a mistake in defining force and pressure relationships.
  • Discussions include the relationship between fluid velocity and pressure, with one participant struggling to connect Bernoulli's principle to the conservation of energy.
  • Another participant expresses a desire to clarify the question and reiterates the known parameters of the system, including the dimensions of the piston and cylinder, the force applied, and the density of the fluid.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct approach to calculate the velocity of efflux. Multiple competing views and uncertainties regarding the definitions and assumptions persist throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in the definitions and assumptions made, particularly regarding the geometry of the pipe and the conditions of the fluid. There are unresolved mathematical steps and dependencies on the area of the pipe that affect the ability to compute flow rates and velocities accurately.

dE_logics
Messages
742
Reaction score
0
I did a few derivations to calculations to figure out the velocity of efflux off a pipe which is situated on the piston of a piston cylinder arrangement.

Attached is the attempt...though I have a doubt in it -

But h will not be the distance if we're considering the upper particles of the block...

An attachment follows...can someone confirm if it's correct?
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
There's a reason why I dropped science.
 
I don't see what you are trying to do here - I see a lot of words and not a lot of meaning in that pdf to describe a situation that at face value looks very simple (if poorly defined): flow rate is equal to rate of volume displacement of the cylinder for an incompressible fluid. Your force and acceleration and velocity analysis math doesn't look at all meaningful/useful.

With this and your other thread, you seem to be putting a lot of effort into making simple issues more complicated than they really are without adding any meaning. I don't see any point/value to any of this, nor do I understand why you have an attitude about it.
 
russ_watters said:
I don't see what you are trying to do here - I see a lot of words and not a lot of meaning in that pdf to describe a situation that at face value looks very simple (if poorly defined): flow rate is equal to rate of volume displacement of the cylinder for an incompressible fluid. Your force and acceleration and velocity analysis math doesn't look at all meaningful/useful.

With this and your other thread, you seem to be putting a lot of effort into making simple issues more complicated than they really are without adding any meaning. I don't see any point/value to any of this, nor do I understand why you have an attitude about it.

Well it is a simple situation actually, but I don't find computing what I want simple.


Obviously I do not know the rate of volume displacement of the cylinder, that's why I'm computing it with pressure...the rate at which fluid from the arrangement will flow out is a function of the width of the pipe, which is also unknown; and I have to find the velocity with all these unknown things.

With this and your other thread, you seem to be putting a lot of effort into making simple issues more complicated

I can't help it!...I am that way!

So what I'm trying to do here is compute the velocity of efflux through that pipe without knowing the area of cross section of that pipe nor having any information about the rate at which the cylinder empties, these are my attempts and I really do not find any attitude in it...it appears to me simple scientific derivations which might be wrong...so I'm trying to see what's wrong in it, or get another right derivation...simple.
 
BTW this doesn't have to do anything with the dam.
 
My answer above was considering a positive displacement (a given displacement) of the piston. More, coming closer to what you were describing...

-The scenario is ill-defined. You can't figure out the flow rate if you don't know the area of the pipe.
-Using an acceleration calculation isn't really correct unless the force is huge and then it becomes more complicated than we can easily deal with here anyway (you have dynamic effects such as compressibility of the fluid, inertia of the piston, etc). The situation will quickly reach a dynamic equilibrium so you should just use a Bernoulli's principle calculation to find the velocity out the pipe.

There is so very much wrong with your math. Start with your first statement: force=p*k. But above that you said p is force. Well if p is force (so is f?) then p*k can't also be force. In fact, force times area isn't anything useful.
 
My answer above was considering a positive displacement (a given displacement) of the piston.

The question does not state a positive displacement.

-The scenario is ill-defined. You can't figure out the flow rate if you don't know the area of the pipe.

I do not want to figure out the flow rate, I want to figure out the velocity of efflux which is possible without knowing the thickness of the pipe.

There is so very much wrong with your math. Start with your first statement: force=p*k. But above that you said p is force. Well if p is force (so is f?) then p*k can't also be force. In fact, force times area isn't anything useful.

Yes, that's wrong...my fault.

The force should have been f*k/A.

Ok, so I'll try it with Bernoulli's principle which I absolutely do not understand or any attempts to understand it results in failure.

All I've known is that as the velocity of the fluid increases, it's pressure decreases, I cannot make relations between this and law of conservation of energy...they say the decrease in pressure of the ideal fluid is used up to increase the K.E. but everyone also agrees with the fact that significant work cannot be done by the pressure stored in an ideal fluid.
 
Last edited:
So I'll give another few attempts to compute the answer using the block theory, then proceed to calculate using bernaulli's principal, i.e if I succeed understanding it.
 
Can someone please do something? I'll try and make the question clearer again -

There's a piston cylinder arrangement, and there's a pipe on top of the piston. What I know -

Dimensions of the piston and cylinder arrangement (not the pipe).
Force on the piston and so pressure in the fluid.
Density of the fluid.
Assume ideal fluid and conditions.


The reason why I bumped this question -

I hit a log 0!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
31
Views
4K