Velocity-Time Graphs and Friction

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mooshk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction Graphs
AI Thread Summary
In a frictionless scenario on an inclined surface, the velocity-time graph is linear, indicating constant acceleration. Introducing friction alters this graph, as friction opposes motion, resulting in different accelerations when moving up and down the incline. The graph's shape changes to a V, reflecting increased speed when descending due to gravitational force. The discussion emphasizes that while acceleration's magnitude remains constant, its direction varies depending on the object's movement. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurately representing motion in velocity-time graphs.
Mooshk
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An object moves up and down an inclined, frictionless surface.
1) Draw a Velocity-Time Graph of this situation.
2) If there was friction, how would it impact the graph?


Homework Equations


Ek = 1/2 m v^2
Eg = mgh
Ek = Eg
I don't think the equations are necessary in the solution, but I included these equations since energy must be conserved as the object moves on the surface, so the final and initial speeds must be the same too.


The Attempt at a Solution


Since the track is frictionless, acceleration should be constant. This means that the velocity graph should be linear with a constant slope. If friction is involved, it will oppose the direction of motion meaning the acceleration up the incline and down the incline will be different, meaning that friction works the same no matter if the object is moving upwards or downwards. So, the velocity graph will not be linear in shape. When the object moves downwards, it should speed up because the parallel component of the gravitational force is in that direction. In that case, the graph should look like a V. Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mooshk said:
Since the track is frictionless, acceleration should be constant. This means that the velocity graph should be linear with a constant slope.

The magnitude of acceleration is constant in the first case, not the direction. If the body moves up again, the motion retards instead of getting accelerated.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top