Verify Linear Transformations: 3.4a, 3.4b

laminatedevildoll
Messages
211
Reaction score
0
I've uploaded a document which I am currently working on. I would like to verify if I am doing these problems correctly. Thank you.

In the first attachment (3.4b)
For 1.
a. 4x^3-2x
b. T(P)=0
ker T={C:C \inR}
Im T = {P|P is less than degree 3 or less}

c. T is not one to one because P is a constant. T is not onto because it's degree less than 3. I am not sure if I am proving this right. I'd appreciate some help.

For 2.
a. 1/5x^5-1/3x^3+C
b.
ker T={C:C \inR}
Im T = {P|P is less than degree 5 or less}
T is not one to one because C=0. But, T is on-to. How do I prove this?

In the second attachment (3.4a) part 4.
I proved that T is one to one because T(f)=T(g), f=g How do I prove that this is on-to?
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
nvm, I understand it.
 



Overall, your work looks good and your reasoning is correct. Here are some suggestions for further clarifications:

For 3.4b, 1:
a. Your answer for T(P) is correct, but you could also write it as T(P) = 0x^3 + 0x^2 + 0x - 0. This might make it clearer that T(P) is a polynomial of degree less than or equal to 3.
b. Your answer for ker T and Im T are correct, but you could also add a brief explanation for why they are the same.
c. Your reasoning is correct, but you could also mention that a constant polynomial cannot be mapped to a non-constant polynomial, so T is not onto.

For 3.4b, 2:
a. Your answer for T(P) is correct, but you could also write it as T(P) = 1/5x^5 + (-1/3)x^3 + C. This might make it clearer that T(P) is a polynomial of degree less than or equal to 5.
b. Again, your answers for ker T and Im T are correct, but you could add a brief explanation for why they are the same.
c. To prove that T is onto, you could show that for any polynomial of degree less than or equal to 5, there exists a polynomial P such that T(P) = that polynomial. In other words, show that for any polynomial Q(x) of degree less than or equal to 5, you can find a polynomial P such that T(P) = Q(x). This would show that every polynomial of degree less than or equal to 5 is in the image of T, and thus T is onto.

For 3.4a, 4:
Your proof for T being one-to-one is correct. To show that it is onto, you could use a similar approach as in 3.4b, 2c. Show that for any polynomial Q(x), there exists a polynomial P such that T(P) = Q(x). This would show that every polynomial is in the image of T, and thus T is onto.

Overall, your work is correct and well-reasoned. Keep up the good work!
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top