Verify Ψ is solution of quantum oscillator using H operator

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around verifying that the wave function Ψ(x) = (1/a√π)½ exp(-(x²/2a²)) is a solution to the time-independent Schrödinger equation (TISE) for a linear harmonic oscillator. The user initially differentiates the wave function and applies the Hamiltonian operator but struggles to simplify the resulting expression to match the energy eigenvalue E_n = (n + ½)ħω. After further calculations, they derive an expression indicating that E equals ħω/2, suggesting that the wave function corresponds to the ground state (n=0). However, confusion arises regarding whether the wave function is indeed a solution, leading to a request for clarification on the final expression for HΨ. The thread highlights the importance of correctly applying the Hamiltonian and interpreting the results in the context of quantum mechanics.
ElectricEel1
Messages
51
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


verify that Ψ(x) = ( 1/a√π)½ exp(-(x2/2a2))
is a solution to the TISE for linear harmonic oscillator. Where a = √(hbar/mw). and V(x) = ½ mw2x2.

Homework Equations


HΨ=EΨ
E_n = (n+½)hbar*w

The Attempt at a Solution



I've started by differentiating the wave function twice to find http://www5a.wolframalpha.com/Calculate/MSP/MSP2111e793aff6db9408500002d959h09e9180hfg?MSPStoreType=image/gif&s=28 .
Then when I apply the Hamiltonian operator to the wave function I can't see a way this would cancel down to (n+½)hbar*w. Have I gone about this the right way at all?

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
pretty sure n=0, I've seen the full version of the wave function i have before and n=0 would make it cancel to what I have now but I am still a little lost
 
if that is the n for that wave function, then that is the equation you must solve...
 
so E should equal 1/2 hbar*w but I can't find a way to make the Schrodinger equation I've written to cancel to that. Maybe I'm not understanding
 
ElectricEel1 said:

Homework Statement


verify that Ψ(x) = ( 1/a√π)½ exp(-(x2/2a2))
is a solution to the TISE for linear harmonic oscillator. Where a = √(hbar/mw). and V(x) = ½ mw2x2.

Homework Equations


HΨ=EΨ
E_n = (n+½)hbar*w

The Attempt at a Solution



I've started by differentiating the wave function twice to find http://www5a.wolframalpha.com/Calculate/MSP/MSP2111e793aff6db9408500002d959h09e9180hfg?MSPStoreType=image/gif&s=28 .
Then when I apply the Hamiltonian operator to the wave function I can't see a way this would cancel down to (n+½)hbar*w. Have I gone about this the right way at all?

Thanks

Show your complete, final, expression for ##H \psi##, so we can tell if you have made an algebraic error or not. Right now, we cannot say where your problem lies.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
hey. since I last posted I think i got a solution.
my expression was
H = -hbar^2/2m d^2/dx^2 + 1/2 mw^2x^2

I took the second derivative of psi and wrote it as (x^2/a^4 - 1/a^2)*psi and then moved everything onto the left hand side with

hbar^2/2m (x^2/a^4 - 1/a^2)psi + (E-1/2mw^2x^2)psi=0

then collected x^2 terms and constant terms and found

E - hbar^2/2ma^2 = 0
so substituting a back into the equation it reduced down to (hbar*w)/2
 
So I had to do the same problem but this time with

2xe*e^((-x^2)/(2a^2))

This time when I collected terms I ended with only one x^3,x^2,x,constant term each. Am I right in thinking this wave function is not a solution then? To the schroedinger equation and linear harmonic oscillator
 
ElectricEel1 said:
So I had to do the same problem but this time with

2xe*e^((-x^2)/(2a^2))

This time when I collected terms I ended with only one x^3,x^2,x,constant term each. Am I right in thinking this wave function is not a solution then? To the schroedinger equation and linear harmonic oscillator

What, exactly, is your final expression for ##H \psi##? Write out all the details!
 
Back
Top