Verifying Electric Field of Charged Rod

hoseA
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/2646/chargedrod1ew.png

I used the equation:

kq/(d(d+L))

I converted everything to meters before doing the calculations. (I'm kind of pressed for time at the moment... i'll post the actual work in 2 hours.)

I want to make sure the equation is right.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
1. An equation must contain an equality. What you've written is an expression. What is it an expression for ? And what do the variables represent ?

2. Have you learned integration ? If you have, I suspect you are required to derive the equation (it's just a 4-line derivation) for the field and substitute the values.

3. Assuming d is the distance to the center of the rod, that is not the equation I get for the field.
 
Gokul43201 said:
1. An equation must contain an equality. What you've written is an expression. What is it an expression for ? And what do the variables represent ?

2. Have you learned integration ? If you have, I suspect you are required to derive the equation (it's just a 4-line derivation) for the field and substitute the values.

3. Assuming d is the distance to the center of the rod, that is not the equation I get for the field.

any more hints? i have to submit my homework in 20 min. :frown:
 
Nevermind. i got it. Thanks for the help Gokul.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top