Verifying that a tensor is isotropic

  • Thread starter Thread starter evlyn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Isotropic Tensor
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around verifying the isotropy of a fourth-rank tensor in the context of Cartesian coordinates. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the definition of isotropy and how to approach the verification process.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to define isotropy more precisely and explore the implications of tensor rotation. The original poster contemplates the steps needed to demonstrate that the tensor remains unchanged under rotation.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants seeking clarity on definitions and methods. Some guidance has been offered regarding the importance of precise definitions in mathematical proofs, while the original poster is still grappling with the initial steps of the verification process.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions a lack of formal education in proof techniques and difficulty finding a mathematical definition of isotropy in their resources.

evlyn
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I'm supposed to verify that this fourth-rank tensor is isotropic assuming cartesian coordinates: [A]_{}[/ijkl]=[δ]_{}[/kl][δ_{}[/kl]

from what I gathered being isotropic means that it stays the same no matter what the rotation is

I have no clue how to even start this problem or what I am looking at.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I recommend that, instead of saying what you "gather" isotropic means, you write out the specific definition. You use the precise words of definitions in mathematics proofs.
 
I'm not even sure how to go about doing that. I am taking math methods but have been out of school for a while and just trying to relearn things and I never took a proof class before. My book does not give any definition other than the one in English but there is no math that I can find that has the definition. Is there someplace I could go to find the definition.
 
So I figured out that I need to rotate the tensor and from there show that it is the same in the new rotation. So if I have A_ijkl=(δ_ij)(δ_kl) In order to transform it I'm not really sure how to proceed.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K