Vertical Spring Oscillation Frequency

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a vertical spring oscillation where a block is dropped onto the spring, leading to oscillatory motion. The context includes concepts from mechanics, specifically relating to energy conservation and harmonic motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conservation of energy as a potential approach, questioning how to relate spring constant (k) to amplitude (A) and mass (m). There are attempts to derive equations for frequency and to clarify the setup of the problem, including the significance of the height from which the block is dropped.

Discussion Status

Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, with participants providing guidance on the correct formulas and relationships. Some participants express uncertainty about their calculations and seek confirmation on their reasoning and derived equations.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the application of conservation of energy and the correct setup of equations. Participants are also navigating through the implications of the spring's compression and the initial drop height.

jzwiep
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A spring is standing upright on a table with its bottom end fastened to the table. A block is dropped from a height 2.8 cm above the top of the spring. The block sticks to the top end of the spring and then oscillates with an amplitude of 12 cm.

What is the oscillation frequency? (Hz)

Homework Equations



Don't know.

The Attempt at a Solution



The only thing I can think of is it looks like a conservation of energy question, but I don't know where to start.

Can anyone give me a nudge in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the equation for the frequency of a mass-spring system? Hint: it includes m and k. You need to figure out k based on the amplitude.
 
Okay, so I found the formula relating k to f:

f=(1/2pi)sqrt(k/m)

I haven't been able to find anything that would relate k to A without any additional variables (like the vmax formula in terms of k, m, and A).

Whatever it is has to cancel out the mass in the f formula, but is there more info in the question that I'm just not getting? Would the fact that it is released 2.8cm above the top of the spring give me another piece of information?

Thanks.
 
Alright, I tried using conservation of energy.

U=mg(A+dL+h)

Where A is the amplitude, dL is the spring compression to equilibrium, and h is the height the height the mass was dropped above the spring.

Along with:

Fg=Fs
mg=k*dL

and

f=(1/2pi)sqrt(k/m)Am I at least on the right track? I can't seem to find an answer, so some help would be much appreciated.
 
jzwiep said:
Alright, I tried using conservation of energy.

U=mg(A+dL+h)
You're on the right track. Where's your conservation of energy equation?
 
Etotal=Us=Up
1/2kA^2=mg(A+dL+h)

I rearrange with equilibrium forces equation to get:

6k^2-145mk-96m^2=0

Then using the quadratic equation to yield:

(145m +/- 220.62m)/144

So k=2.539m

Then I substituted in for k in

f=(1/2pi)sqrt(k/m)

f=(1/2pi)sqrt(2.539)
=3.9883Hz
=4.0Hz

Which wasn't the right answer.
 
jzwiep said:
Etotal=Us=Up
1/2kA^2=mg(A+dL+h)
Careful here. The spring is compressed from its original uncompressed position, not just from the new equilibrium position.
 
jzwiep said:
Etotal=Us=Up
1/2k(A+dL)^2=mg(A+dL+h)

I rearrange with equilibrium forces equation to get:

72k^2-145mk-48m^2=0

Then using the quadratic equation to yield:

(145m +/- 186.68m)/144

So k=2.303m

Then I substituted in for k in

f=(1/2pi)sqrt(k/m)

f=(1/2pi)sqrt(2.303)
=2.38Hz

Is this now the correct formula? I only have a few attempts left so I didn't want to check if the answer was right.
 
jzwiep said:
Is this now the correct formula? I only have a few attempts left so I didn't want to check if the answer was right.
Yes, that's the correct formula. I haven't checked your calculation, but I'd be happy to do so later when I have some time. (If you can wait a few hours; I'll be off line for a bit.)
 
  • #10
If you wouldn't mind doing so that'd be great. Thanks.
 
  • #11
I get a different answer.
jzwiep said:
Etotal=Us=Up
1/2k(A+dL)^2=mg(A+dL+h)
So far, so good.
I rearrange with equilibrium forces equation to get:

72k^2-145mk-48m^2=0
Show how you got this one.
 
  • #12
dL=mg/k

1/2k(A+mg/k)^{2}=mg(A+mg/k+h)

1/2kA^{2} + 1/2m^{2}g^{2}/k = mg(A+h) + m^{2}g^{2}/k

1/2k^{2}A^{2}- kmg(A+h)-1/2m^{2}g^{2}=0
 
  • #13
jzwiep said:
dL=mg/k

1/2k(A+mg/k)^{2}=mg(A+mg/k+h)
Looks good.

1/2kA^{2} + 1/2m^{2}g^{2}/k = mg(A+h) + m^{2}g^{2}/k
Ah... looks like you made an error when you expanded (A+mg/k)2.

(a + b)2 ≠ a2 + b2
 
  • #14
Ah, that was silly of me
jzwiep said:
dL=mg/k

1/2k(A+mg/k)^{2}=mg(A+mg/k+h)

1/2kA^{2} + Amg + 1/2m^{2}g^{2}/k = mg(A+h) + m^{2}g^{2}/k

1/2k^{2}A^{2}- kmgh-1/2m^{2}g^{2}=0

So changing that gives me:

72k^{2} - 27.44mk - 48m^{2}

Which works out to:

k=1.02899m

Giving me a:

f=http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=sqrt(1.02899)/(2pi)"

Is that correct?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #15
I'd say you're off by a factor of 10, so double-check your arithmetic.
 
  • #16
Okay it looks like I did the quadratic wrong,

(27.44m + 117.895m)/144

k=1.00927m

Which gives f=0.15989Hz

But that's not a factor of 10 off. I double checked my algebra for:

1/2k^{2}A^{2} - kmgh-1/2m^{2}g^{2} =0

And it looks right. Do you know if I'm getting my error from here? or from my quadratic?
 
  • #17
jzwiep said:
But that's not a factor of 10 off. I double checked my algebra for:

1/2k^{2}A^{2} - kmgh-1/2m^{2}g^{2} =0

And it looks right. Do you know if I'm getting my error from here? or from my quadratic?
That equation looks fine. You're making an error when you solve the quadratic.
 
  • #18
Alright, thanks for the help.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K