Can High School Physics Explain Motion with Constant Acceleration and Velocity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Signifier
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the application of high school physics principles to motion with constant acceleration and velocity. The initial question concerns the z-velocity of an object under constant acceleration, which is clarified to depend on the net acceleration after accounting for gravity. It is emphasized that one must consider the net force to determine the unique acceleration acting on the object. Additionally, the z-position of an object moving at constant velocity does not include a gravitational term, as that scenario is distinct from one involving acceleration. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly interpreting forces and accelerations in physics problems.
Signifier
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
Okay, this is high school physics I know but I still need to ask it.

Say I give something a constant acceleration A straight up into the air (A = [0,0,+Az]). If I ignore drag, then the object's z-velocity as a function of time with this constant acceleration will be

(Az - g)t

(where Az is the z-component of the acceleration) if the initial z-velocity at time t = 0 is 0. Am I correct?

Next question: say that an object is traveling straight up through the air with a constant velocity V0. Is the object's z-position as a function of time equal to

V0t - 0.5gt^2 + Z0

(where Z0 is the initial z position) or is it something else?

Sorry if I didn't word these questions right - I'm still very new to this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the object were traveling straight up at a constant velocity you wouldn't have the 0.5gt^2 term, this case would be equivilant to having Az=g in your previous example.
 
Signifier said:
Okay, this is high school physics I know but I still need to ask it.

Say I give something a constant acceleration A straight up into the air (A = [0,0,+Az]). If I ignore drag, then the object's z-velocity as a function of time with this constant acceleration will be

(Az - g)t

(where Az is the z-component of the acceleration) if the initial z-velocity at time t = 0 is 0. Am I correct?

No.

Don`t confuse forces with acceleration. It`s confusing when you say that you ''give something a constant acceleration Az''. If this is really what you mean, then you mean that you applied a force stronger than gravity in such a way that the net acceleration is Az (which I assume positive from your statement ''staright up in the air''). Then the velocity is Az t! Period!
An object has only one acceleration, given by the net force divided by the mass. One adds the forces *first* and then one finds the (unique) acceleration. One never adds acceleration. So if you say that you give an object an acceleration Az, it means you applied a force such that the combination of your force and of the force of gravity yields the acceleration Az. Then v = Az t.

Pat
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top