Violate the principle of relativity?

tkm2002
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In a water pipe, the light moves in the same direction of the water flow. It is
determined that the speed of light is dependent on the speed of water flow. Does
that violate the principle of relativity?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


why the speed of light is dependent?
I know it should not be violate the principle of relativity but I don't know how to explain.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are looking at a famous relativity example.

A distinction must be made between "speed of light (in a given medium)" and "speed of light in a vacuum (the speed limit of the universe)". I call the latter the "information speed limit".

I can suggest some more if you want, but that nugget of info above may be useful to you :).

EDIT: Actually, that is a downright awful attempt at being helpful, let's see if I can do better. You need to know about velocity addition formulae to answer the question. If you have tried all of that to no avail, then the water stuff is known as the fizeau experiment (books and interwebs know all about it)
 
Last edited:
tkm2002 said:
In a water pipe, the light moves in the same direction of the water flow. It is determined that the speed of light is dependent on the speed of water flow. Does that violate the principle of relativity?

Hi tkm2002! :smile:

No, it confirms the principle of relativity …

the v(1 ± 1/n2) formula is what special relativity predicts (by adding or subtracting v, the speed of the water, to c/n, the speed of light in the water) …

see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fizeau_experiment#Derivation_in_special_relativity" :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Last edited by a moderator:
Special Relativity has a formula for "adding" velocities.

That formula is different from ordinary adding, but it agrees with the results of Fizeau's experiment …

so Fizeau's experiment does not violate Special Relativity, but confirms it.

See that link for details. :smile:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top