Voltage at Halfway Point Between Point Charges in an Equilateral Triangle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the voltage at a point halfway between two point charges in an equilateral triangle configuration. The charges are +Q, +2Q, and -4Q, with a side length of L. The voltage is derived using the formula Vnet = V1 + V2 + V3, where the individual voltages are calculated based on their respective distances. There is some confusion regarding the distance used in the calculations, particularly for the -4Q charge, with participants correcting each other on the use of L and cos(30). The final expression for the net voltage is simplified to Vnet = kQ[(2/L) + (4/L) - (4cos30/L)].
rissa_rue13
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


There is an equilateral triangle with one point charge at each vertex. The point charges have charges of +Q, +2Q, and -4Q. The length of one side of the triangle is L. Determine an expression in simplest form for the voltage at a point halfway between the +Q and +2Q point charges.

Homework Equations


V=kQ/r
Vnet=V1+V2+V3

The Attempt at a Solution


Going off of Vnet=V1+V2+V3:
Vnet= (kQ/r) + (k2Q/r) - (k4Q/r)
I think once substituting the values for L in place of r, you get:
Vnet= (kQ/(L/2)) + (k2Q/(L/2)) - (k4Q/Lcos30)
Am I heading in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, that looks good.
 
I think I made a mistake, I think it should be:
Vnet= (kQ/(L/2)) + (k2Q/(L/2)) - (k4Q/(L/cos 30))

This can then be simplified:
Vnet=kQ[(2/L)+(4/L)-(4cos30/L)]

Am I on the right track?
 
rissa_rue13 said:
I think I made a mistake, I think it should be:
Vnet= (kQ/(L/2)) + (k2Q/(L/2)) - (k4Q/(L/cos 30))

This can then be simplified:
Vnet=kQ[(2/L)+(4/L)-(4cos30/L)]

Am I on the right track?

The distance from the far vertex is L(cos 30). I think you were right the first time.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top