Voltage Drop & EMF: Inductor Circuit Explained

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the roles of conservative and non-conservative electric fields in an RL circuit with an inductor. It explores how the conservative field drives current in the same direction as the voltage drop, while the non-conservative field opposes it, creating confusion about energy transfer. Participants emphasize that charges move to lower potential and that understanding energy transfer is more crucial than focusing solely on fields. The conversation also touches on the relevance of capacitance in analyzing RL circuits, suggesting a broader view that includes RLC circuit dynamics. Ultimately, the key takeaway is the importance of potential differences in circuit behavior over the individual contributions of electric fields.
tonyjk
Messages
227
Reaction score
3
Hello,
Please i have a question.When we have an inductor in a circuit we say that we have 2 electric field : conservative and non-conservative. so who is doing work on the charges?if we draw an rl circuit with a DC source the conservative electric field across the inductor has the same direction of the current thus the voltage drop but the non conservative electric field has the opposite direction thus doing work against the electric field thus the rise of the voltage. this is confusing me a lot
thank you
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Can we say that the charges inside the inductor do not move?
 
tonyjk said:
Can we say that the charges inside the inductor do not move?

1mm per second is not moving much, imo. If you concern yourself with the distances involved in a circuit then the speed of propagation of the electric and magnetic fields is just a tiny bit greater than the drift velocity of the electrons ( by a factor of at least 10^10).

There are occasions when the motion of charge carriers becomes relevant - for instance, in some semiconductors - but that tends to be considered separately and that approach gets good results.
 
but who's driving the current ? the conservative electric field or the non conservative one? and from where the conservative electric field is coming? and in an RL AC circuit there's a part of time where the inductance is giving energy in this part who's driving the current?
 
Last edited:
tonyjk said:
but who's driving the current ? the conservative electric field or the non conservative one? and from where the conservative electric field is coming? and in an RL AC circuit there's a part of time where the inductance is giving energy in this part who's driving the current?

Where's the force coming from that makes the link in a bicycle chain move? The direction of the 'original' force is the direction of the cyclist's foot and that could be in totally the opposite direction to the direction that the link is moving. The thing that's "driving the current" can be the steam in the turbine that's driving the alternator back at the Power Station or it can be the charge that's immediately to the left or right of the charge in question. The answer to the question is that it's irrelevant, once you have accepted that the charges move to lower potential. What is important is the Energy transfer and this is why we discuss the behaviour of circuits in terms of Potential Differences. Now, Field is the gradient of Potential, so we are not totally rejecting the idea of Fields. They are just less relevant than Potentials.

Perhaps you are trying to analyse the RL circuit in an 'unfruitful' way. If you want to talk about fields then would you not also be needing to consider the Capacitance which must surely be there? Any such circuit boils down to an RLC circuit, considerably (possibly) off resonance.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
The non-conservative field in the inductor's coils resist any changes in current. The conservative field is the external forces being applied to the inductor that are being resisted.

Perhaps this can help:
https://njctl.org/courses/science/ap-physics-c/induction/inductance-presentation/?download&token=933f0f0ca62599c37e09e83ca6b24c60&attachment_version=220110728142937&format=pdf-1-slide-per-page

Does that help? If not, ask differently based on what's been said.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top