Voltage inbetween two angled plates?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ayol
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plates Voltage
Ayol
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Potential between two angled plates?

I have a problem involving two angled plates

Diagram
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/841/paintzr.jpg/

L=10cm
d=1mm
\phi= 1°

Where I'm supposed to find the potential at any point between the plates. I recognize that I'm supposed to use the Laplace equation in cylindrical coordinates and that V is independent of z, but I end up with an equation that looks like:

0=1/ρ * ∂/∂ρ * (ρ * ∂V/∂ρ) + 1/ρ^2 * ∂^2v/∂ \Phi ^2 (I think)

and I have no idea what I'm supposed to do with it. If someone could clarify that it would be nice.

Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation you have is correct. To solve it, you can separate the variables using the method of separation of variables. That is, assume that the solution has the form V(ρ,ϕ)=X(ρ)Y(ϕ). Substituting this form into the Laplace equation will yield two ordinary differential equations which can be solved separately. The general solution will be a linear combination of these two solutions.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top