Voltage Regulator Project: Hysterisis, 9V, 15 Ohm Load

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on designing a voltage regulator for a university project that requires producing 9V from a 16Vrms AC source while handling a 15-ohm load and incorporating hysteresis and overload protection. Participants suggest placing the current sensing resistor before the transistor to simplify grounding and question the use of a snubber on the flywheel diode, noting it could reduce efficiency. There is a strong emphasis on the necessity of including hysteresis in the comparator circuit for stability. Concerns are raised about using a Darlington transistor due to its potential impact on efficiency, and the idea of using a simple 9V DC regulator is dismissed as inadequate for the assignment's requirements. Overall, the thread highlights the complexities of designing a switching regulator versus a linear one.
LostEngKid
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
hey guys, I've got to make a voltage regulator for a uni project. it has to use hysterisis and produce 9v out from a 16Vrms AC powerpack over a 15 ohm load. It also needs overload protection, I've drawn up the attached circuit, i think it will work and filled in some of the values i know but I am stuck for the others, any help would be great.

circuit.JPG
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not qualified to analyze a circuit like that, but what about using a simple 9Vdc regulator after cap C6?
 
I think that's cheating!
 
LostEngKid said:
hey guys, I've got to make a voltage regulator for a uni project. it has to use hysterisis and produce 9v out from a 16Vrms AC powerpack over a 15 ohm load. It also needs overload protection, I've drawn up the attached circuit, i think it will work and filled in some of the values i know but I am stuck for the others, any help would be great.

View attachment 15072

Couple comments:

-- Usually I would put the current sensing resistor in the + feed, right before Q1. Having it in the negative return complicates the grounding of this non-isolated buck converter.

-- I'm not sure about the snubber on the flywheel diode. I've never used one, and generally haven't seen them used in bucks. It will lower your efficiency at least. Why do you have it there?

-- It seems like you should consider putting a bit of hysteresis in your comparator circuit. I'm not generally comfortable with comparator circuits without at least some postitive feedback hysteresis.
 
Redbelly98 said:
I'm not qualified to analyze a circuit like that, but what about using a simple 9Vdc regulator after cap C6?

I get the feeling that the assignment is to design a switching regulator, rather than a linear regulator.
 
berkeman said:
Couple comments:

-- Also, is there a reason that you are using a Darlington for Q1? That will impact your efficiency pretty significantly.


Quiz Question: Why?

.
 
Redbelly98 said:
... what about using a simple 9Vdc regulator after cap C6?

mgb_phys said:
I think that's cheating!

berkeman said:
I get the feeling that the assignment is to design a switching regulator, rather than a linear regulator.

Whoops, my bad!
 
berkeman said:
Couple comments:

-- It seems like you should consider putting a bit of hysteresis in your comparator circuit. I'm not generally comfortable with comparator circuits without at least some postitive feedback hysteresis.

Another Quiz Question for the original poster (OP) -- Why do I say this about comparator hysteresis?
 
Back
Top