Voltage Translation: Can a Capacitor Do It?

AI Thread Summary
Transferring thin pulses (0.5V, 100 ns) to a transistor base at -70V using only a capacitor is not advisable, as the output may swing negatively, affecting the transistor's bias. A clamping diode is recommended to prevent this issue, with a Schottky diode suggested for its speed and low capacitance. Adjustments to bias resistors may be necessary to maintain the input waveform shape. An alternative method mentioned is using an optocoupler for better isolation and control. Overall, while the capacitor idea is intriguing, it requires careful consideration of additional components to function correctly.
Ravaner
Messages
134
Reaction score
3
Hello. I wish to transfer very thin pulses ( 0, 5V, 100 ns) to the base of a transistor which emitter is at -70 V (and base correctly DC polarized). I don't want to use traditionnal translater circuit using npn+pnp transistors, but just a capacitor (supporting the voltage difference). Is there any reason against this kind of idea ?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You could also use a 70v Zener diode as a level shifter.
 
Normally, if you just fed this through a capacitor, the output would swing negative relative to the base as well as positive.
This is probably not what you want as the transistor would be biased for low standing current.

So, you need a clamping diode. I would try something like this:

clamp diode.PNG


The unmarked resistors are the normal bias resistors. This would need adjusting.
R may be necessary to maintain the input waveform shape.
The diode would be a Schottky type for speed and low capacitance.

I haven't tried it, of course, so it may not work or may need adjusting.

Another way would be to use an optocoupler.
 
Many, many thanks for your help. This goes in the way to confirm of what I previously suppose.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top