Volume Charge Density of Proton Beam

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the volume charge density of a 1.0 mA proton beam accelerated through a 1 keV potential difference. The participant arrives at a charge density of approximately 1.1x10^-4 C/m³, which aligns with another user's calculations. There is uncertainty regarding the accuracy of the solution provided in the notes, as the participant's result differs by a factor of 10^-4. The calculations involve using the equations for work and charge density, considering the beam's uniform current distribution. The conversation highlights the importance of verifying solutions in physics problems.
muonneutrino91
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


1.0 mA proton beam accelerated through potential difference of 1 keV.
Determine the volume charge density of the beam after acceleration assuming uniform current distribution within diameter of 5mm, with zero current outside of this.
Particle starting from rest.

Final answer I get is out by 10-4 to the solution given in my notes. Pretty certain its a mistake in the notes, somebody seconding this would give me peace at mind.

Homework Equations


ρ = I/νA
W = qV

ρ = charge density,
A = surface area of beam,
I = beam current,
v = proton velocity,
W = work
V = voltage

The Attempt at a Solution


W = 1.6x10-16 J = KEfinal (since starting from rest)

∴ 2W/mproton = v2
∴ v ≈4.4x105

A = π 6.25x10-6 m2

∴ ρ = 0.001 / π.(6.25x10-6).4.4x105 ≈1.1x10-4
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, I just worked through the problem and obtained the same result as you, assuming your answer is in units of coulombs/cubic metre.
 
  • Like
Likes muonneutrino91
TonyS said:
Hi, I just worked through the problem and obtained the same result as you, assuming your answer is in units of coulombs/cubic metre.

Thanks, TonyS.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top