Volume of a Cone in n-Dimensions: Problem & Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter daftjaxx1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cone Volume
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the volume of a cone in n-dimensions, defined by a constant cross-section that shrinks to zero at height h. The volume of the cone is expressed in terms of the volume of its cross-section at h=0, denoted as V_o, leading to a formula involving the height and dimensions. Participants clarify that the cross-section volume at h=0 refers to the area for lower dimensions, while also exploring the geometric interpretation for n=1, 2, and 3. There is confusion regarding the region defined by the inequality |x_1| + ... + |x_n| ≤ r, with questions about the nature of "r" as a constant. Overall, the thread emphasizes understanding the relationship between dimensionality and volume in higher-dimensional geometry.
daftjaxx1
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Can someone help me with this problem?:

We will define a cone in n-dimensions as a figure with a cross - section along its height X_n that has a constant shape, but each of its dimensions is shrunk linearly to 0.

a)let D be a cone in R^n with height h (ie. X_n \epsilon [0, h]) and let the volume of its cross-section at h=0 be V_o. Find the volume of D in terms of V_o.

b)Find the volume of the region defined by |x_1| +...+ |x_n| \le r in R^n, using a)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(a) The "volume" of an n-1 figure is proportional to the product of the dimensions. Since the dimensions depend linearly on z (you used h as both height of the entire cone and the variable in that direction- I'm going to call thevariable z) and goes to 0 at z= h, the cross section volume is proportional to (h-z)n-1. Since the volume at z= 0 is V0, we must have V(0)=V_0(\frac{h-z}{h})^{n-1}. The "n-dimensional" volume of a thin "slab" of thickness Δz will be V_0(\frac{h-z}{h})^{n-1}\Delta z. Convert that to an integral.

(b) What does this volume look like? Sketch it for n= 1, 2, 3.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
hi,
thanks for the response. just to clarify, when it says the "volume of its cross section at h=0 is V_o, is it really referring to the "area" of the cross section? (eg. if we're talking about 3 dimensions)? its sort of hard to visualize.

i still don't get how to do b). so if n=1, the volume is a line, if n=2, its a triangle, and if n=3, its the cone we're used to, right? i don't know how to work with the given region |x_1| +...+ |x_n| \le r. is "r" just some constant??
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top