Volume of parametrized manifold

  • Thread starter Thread starter beastmaster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Manifold Volume
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the volume of a parametrized manifold, specifically the graph of a function f: A → R, where A is open in R^k. The volume V(Y@) is expressed as an integral involving the determinant of the derivative matrix D@ and its transpose. The equation provided is V(Y@) = ∫_A det((D@)^tr D@) dA. The participants seek clarification on the simplification of the matrix multiplication involved in this calculation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of parametrized manifolds
  • Familiarity with multivariable calculus
  • Knowledge of determinant and matrix operations
  • Experience with C^r class functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of parametrized manifolds in differential geometry
  • Learn about the Jacobian matrix and its applications in volume calculations
  • Explore integration techniques for multivariable functions
  • Review Munkres' Analysis on Manifolds for additional context and examples
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying differential geometry, and anyone interested in advanced calculus and manifold theory.

beastmaster
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I don't think this is a difficult problem, but I am not sure about what is being asked in the question. I got it from Munkres' Analysis on Manifolds page 193 Q 2.


Homework Statement



Let A be open in R^k; let f : A-->R be of class C^r; let Y be the graph of f in R^(k+1), parametrized by the function @(x) = (x, f(x)). Express V(Y@) as an integral. (this is the volume of the graph of f)


Homework Equations



the volume of a parametrized manifold, or V(Y@) = integral over A of det((D@)^tr D@), where D@ is the derivative matrix of @ and D@^tr is the transpose of D@.

The Attempt at a Solution



I think I would just use the above equation to express V(Y@) as an integral. But then I would be done a little too quickly, so I thought that maybe I am supposed to simplify the matrix multiplication or something. Am I missing something here?

Also, can someone tell me how to post using mathematical symbols?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can anyone confirm I am on the right track or am I way off? Or, at the very least, can someone tell me how to post using mathematical symbols. I am not very computer savvy. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K