Water discharge and Bernoulli's equation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Bernoulli's equation to an open tank discharging water into the atmosphere. Participants explore the relationship between static pressure, dynamic pressure, and total pressure at the discharge point, questioning why the static pressure is considered equal to atmospheric pressure rather than total pressure.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the pressure at the discharge point is considered equal to atmospheric pressure, questioning why total pressure is not used instead.
  • Another participant explains that the total pressure is equal on both sides of the discharge, with elevation pressure after the hole being zero.
  • A different participant argues that the dynamic pressure before the hole is not negligible and that total pressures before and after the hole do not match as expected.
  • Some participants assert that the static pressure at the discharge point is atmospheric, while total pressure includes both static and dynamic components.
  • One participant suggests that static pressure can be lower than atmospheric pressure as long as it is compensated by dynamic pressure, referencing a De Laval nozzle to support their point.
  • Another participant counters that the De Laval nozzle pertains to compressible flow, while the discussion is focused on incompressible, subsonic flow, emphasizing that static pressure is atmospheric due to the absence of other pressure sources.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit disagreement regarding the treatment of static and total pressures at the discharge point, with multiple competing views on whether static pressure can be lower than atmospheric pressure if compensated by dynamic pressure. The discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference different assumptions about pressure conditions before and after the discharge point, with some suggesting that dynamic pressure can be significant while others argue it is negligible. The applicability of Bernoulli's equation in different flow regimes is also debated.

PTlusitano
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Dear all,


I have found in the literature that if there is a open tank discharging water into the atmosphere the pressure at the discharge point is considered to be equal to the atmospheric pressure.

If one looks to the Bernoulli's equation and assuming no friction:

Pressure + Elevation Pressure + Dynamic pressure = Total Pressure

So, my question is:

Why do they consider the Pressure at the discharge point to be equal to the atmospheric pressure and not the Total Pressure instead? Shouldn't it be similar to the Venturi case, where there is a pressure decrease due to an increase in velocity.

Couldn't we be pumping water against atmospheric pressure with a Pressure< 101 325 Pa but compensated by the discharge velocity of 5 m/s, for example (no calculations done)?


Regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are the pressures before the hole and after. The total pressure is equal on both sides. The elevation pressure after the hole is zero. The atmospheric pressure difference across the hole is zero. The dynamic pressure before the hole is assumed to be very small and set to zero. So you get Pa+Pe+0 = Pa+0+Pd or Pe=Pd, where Pe is the elevation pressure before the hole, Pd is the dynamic pressure after the hole.
 
Thanks for being so swift answering me.

The dynamic pressure before the hole is not assumed to be very small. In the literature aforementioned in my post, the authors seek to calculate the velocity for the discharge.

I, too, thought that the total pressure before the hole and after the hole should be the same. But, the total pressure after the hole is Patm, and after the hole is Patm + Dynamic pressure. Therefore, the two don't match as they should.
 
PTlusitano said:
Thanks for being so swift answering me.

The dynamic pressure before the hole is not assumed to be very small. In the literature aforementioned in my post, the authors seek to calculate the velocity for the discharge.

I, too, thought that the total pressure before the hole and after the hole should be the same. But, the total pressure after the hole is Patm, and after the hole is Patm + Dynamic pressure. Therefore, the two don't match as they should.

Total pressure before the hole is Patm+Elevation pressure, after the hole its Patm + Dynamic pressure.
 
The static pressure at the discharge point is equal to Patm, not the total pressure. The total pressure = static + dynamic = Patm + dynamic.
 
RandomGuy88 said:
The static pressure at the discharge point is equal to Patm, not the total pressure. The total pressure = static + dynamic = Patm + dynamic.

Right, just after (downstream, outside the tank) of the outlet, the static pressure is Patm and the total pressure is Patm+Pdynamic. Just before (upstream, inside the tank) the outlet, the static pressure is Patm+Pelev and the dynamic pressure is very small, because the tank is much larger in cross section than the hole, so the velocity of the water in the tank as it heads towards the hole is small compared to the velocity at which the water is ejected. So small that it is generally ignored and the dynamic pressure before the hole is set to zero. So setting the total pressure equal on both sides gives Patm+Pelev=Patm+Pdynamic or Pelev=Pdynamic.
 
I would like to understand why do you consider the static pressure at the discharge to be equal to the atmospheric pressure. All that is required is the total pressure to be bigger than the atmospheric pressure. As long as the static pressure is compensated by the dynamic pressure, the static pressure can be lower than the atmospheric pressure.

I have found this link that I think helps to prove my point:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Laval_nozzle

I would like to stress this paragraph:

"the exit pressure can be significantly below ambient pressure it exhausts into, but if it is too far below ambient, then the flow will cease to be supersonic"

So, as one can see, it is said that the discharge pressure to the atmosphere can be lower than the atmospheric pressure.
 
PTlusitano said:
I would like to understand why do you consider the static pressure at the discharge to be equal to the atmospheric pressure. All that is required is the total pressure to be bigger than the atmospheric pressure. As long as the static pressure is compensated by the dynamic pressure, the static pressure can be lower than the atmospheric pressure.

I have found this link that I think helps to prove my point:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Laval_nozzle

I would like to stress this paragraph:

"the exit pressure can be significantly below ambient pressure it exhausts into, but if it is too far below ambient, then the flow will cease to be supersonic"

So, as one can see, it is said that the discharge pressure to the atmosphere can be lower than the atmospheric pressure.

The De Laval nozzle is for compressible, supersonic flow. I don't think Bernoulli's equation is valid for supersonic flow. Anyway, water is practically incompressible, so the situation being considered here is for incompressible, very subsonic flow.

The static pressure is atmospheric after the hole because there is no other source of pressure. The potential energy of the water due to the elevation, before the hole, has been entirely converted to kinetic energy of the flow, so there is no elevation pressure after the hole.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
6K
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K