Water Flow Discharge: Is My Thinking Correct?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between fluid pressure and tube design. It confirms that static pressure at the bottom of a tube is determined solely by the height of the fluid column, not by the tube's length or shape. Both tubes, despite differing lengths and configurations, exert pressure based on their fluid heights, with the straight tube having a higher pressure due to its greater height. The amount of liquid in the tubes does not affect the pressure at the bottom. Overall, the key takeaway is that pressure is influenced by fluid height rather than tube characteristics.
pragmaticindulgence
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I've got two tubes filled with liquid, their both of equal diameters, the first one is straight up and down about 20 feet long, the other is 100 feet long but is spiraled like on a spool, since the straight tube has a higher fall than the spiral, I would assume that the straight tube would have more pressure.
Is my thinking correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Pragmatic. Yes, your answer is correct. If there is no flow in the tubes (the fluid is static) then the only thing pressure at the bottom of the tube is dependant on is "head" or the height of the fluid. It is also independant of the diameter, length and shape of the tube. Pressure at the bottom is simply the density times gravity times height plus whatever pressure there is at the top of the fluid, it's that simple.
 
What pressure are you referring to? The static pressure at the bottom of the tube? Are the tops and bottoms of the tubes at the same heights? Are both tubes filled with the same liquid to the same level?
 
Perhaps pressure is not the right discription, I should of probably said force?
The spiral is lower, but both are even at the bottom.
Both have water, but the spiral since it is 100 foot long it would have that much more water.
 
No. Pressure is the correct term. After what you have mentioned, Q's reply is the appropriate one. As he mentioned, the pressure head is going to be only dependent on the height of the water, not the amount.
 
thanks, may have another question on
this later.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
56
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Back
Top